检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向鹏[1] 张书炜 XIANG Peng;ZHANG Shuwei(Law School,Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang 550025,Guizhou,China)
出 处:《安顺学院学报》2024年第4期130-135,共6页Journal of Anshun University
摘 要:刑事和解制度不仅能有效利用司法资源,其对被害人的保障更加全面,也对社会秩序的修复起到作用,但此项制度在司法实践中的适用依然存在适用率不高,适用范围过窄,解方式单一,和解协议效力难以保障等问题。对于这些问题,应从立法扩大刑事和解案件适用范围、实践探索多元和解方式等方面使其完善,以期更大程度地发挥制度本身的积极价值。After the amendment of China's Criminal Procedure Law,the criminal reconciliation system was added to the law.This system not only effectively utilizes judicial resources,but also provides more comprehensive protection for victims and plays a role in repairing social order.However,there are still problems with the application of this system in judicial practice,such as low applicability,narrow scope of application,single settlement methods,and difficulty in ensuring the effectiveness of settlement agreements.To address these issues,we should expand the scope of application of criminal reconciliation cases through legislation and explore multiple reconciliation methods in practice to improve it,in order to maximize the positive value of the system itself.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.0.231