材料史:一个德语比较文学概念的死与生  

The Name and Nature of Stoffgeschichte in Comparative Literature

作　　者：杨俊杰[1] Yang Junjie

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学文学院

出　　处：《中国比较文学》2024年第3期16-30,共15页Comparative Literature in China

摘　　要：材料史最初在德语比较文学领域里占据统治地位,之后遭遇法语比较文学的严厉抨击。法国学者梵·第根明确提出以主题学来替代材料史。材料史为主题学所替代,甚可谓20世纪比较文学领域的重要事件。本文通过梳理指出,材料史在比较文学领域里还有发展空间,更有继续存活的权利。首先,以歌德的三分法为依托,可知材料史是一种无法被替代的研究门类。其次,以贝茨关于材料史所作设想及其关于比较文学领域所作划分为依据,可知材料史由格林式的材料史研究和贝茨式的材料史研究构成。考虑到材料史在研究内容、研究方式上与主题学有所不同,其比较文学前景也就仍然值得期待。It is well known that the study of Stoffgeschichte came from German comparative literature and was severely criticized by French comparative literature scholars.Van Tieghem's suggestion that it shouid be replaced by Thematics(thematologie)has been accepted nowadays,even for German comparative literature studies.The paper argues that Stoffgeschichte,if properly refined on the basis of both Louis P.Betz and Goethe,could still have its own place besides Thematics.

关 键 词：材料史 德语比较文学 主题学 歌德 贝茨 

分 类 号：I0-03[文学—文学理论]