血清游离轻链在肺癌中的表达及诊断价值  

Expression and diagnostic value of serum free light chain in lung cancer

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:肖玺 郑丽 曾华[2] 陈丹[1] 刘黎琴[3] 董彩梅[1] 张艳平[1] XIAO Xi;ZHENG Li;ZENG Hua;CHEN Dan;LIU Liqin;DONG Caimei;ZHANG Yanping(Department of Respiratory Medicine,Xiangdong Hospital,Hunan Normal University,Liling Hunan 412200;Department of Neurology,Xiangdong Hospital,Hunan Normal University,Liling Hunan 412200;Department of Radiology,Xiangdong Hospital,Hunan Normal University,Liling Hunan 412200,China)

机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学附属湘东医院呼吸内科,湖南醴陵412200 [2]湖南师范大学附属湘东医院神经内科,湖南醴陵412200 [3]湖南师范大学附属湘东医院放射科,湖南醴陵412200

出  处:《中南大学学报(医学版)》2024年第6期914-920,共7页Journal of Central South University :Medical Science

基  金:湖南省教育厅项目(20C1177)。

摘  要:目的:血清游离轻链(free light chain,FLC)在多种疾病中表达异常,但其在肺癌中的表达尚不清楚,本研究旨在探讨血清FLC在肺癌中的表达及诊断价值。方法:选取2021年1至12月湖南师范大学附属湘东医院收治的80例肺癌患者作为肺癌组,另选取同时期的80例健康体检人员作为对照组。收集所有参与者的一般资料、血清κFLC和λFLC水平;收集肺癌组患者住院期间的相关临床指标[血清癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)、细胞角蛋白-19片段抗原(cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1,CYFRA21-1)水平,以及肿瘤直径、组织学分型、TNM分期、是否有淋巴结转移]。比较肺癌组和对照组血清FLC[κFLC、λFLC、FLC(κ+λ)]的表达水平。将80例肺癌患者按性别、年龄、吸烟史、肿瘤直径、TNM分期、组织学分型、淋巴结转移进行分组,比较组间血清κFLC、λFLC表达水平的差异。采用受试者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评价血清FLC水平单独及联合其他指标在肺癌中的诊断价值。结果:肺癌组血清FLC(κ+λ)、κFLC表达水平均显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001);而2组间血清λFLC表达水平的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不同肿瘤直径、组织学分型、TNM分期的肺癌血清κFLC表达水平差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);但是,有淋巴结转移的肺癌患者血清κFLC水平高于无淋巴结转移的肺癌患者,且差异有统计学意义(P=0.033)。不同肿瘤直径、组织学分型肺癌患者的血清λFLC表达水平差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);但是,TNM分期III期+IV期、有淋巴结转移的肺癌患者血清λFLC表达水平分别高于TNM分期I期+II期、无淋巴结转移的肺癌患者,差异均有统计学意义(分别P=0.033,P=0.019)。κFLC、CEA诊断肺癌的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)差异无统计学意义(P=0.333)。在2项联合诊断肺癌的指标中,κFLC+CYFRA21-1的诊断效能(AUC=0.875)�Objective:The expression of serum free light chain(FLC)is abnormal in various diseases,but its role in lung cancer remains unclear.This study aims to investigate the expression and diagnostic value of serum FLC in lung cancer.Methods:A total of 80 lung cancer patients treated at Xiangdong Hospital,Hunan Normal University from January to December 2021 were selected as the lung cancer group.Another 80 healthy individuals undergoing routine physical examinations during the same period were chosen as the control group.General information and serumκFLC andλFLC levels were collected for all subjects.Clinical indicators such as serum carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1(CYFRA21-1)levels,tumor diameter,histological type,TNM stage,and lymph node metastasis status were recorded for lung cancer patients.The expression levels of serum FLC[κFLC,λFLC,and FLC(κ+λ)]were compared between the lung cancer group and the control group.Lung cancer patients were grouped based on gender,age,smoking history,tumor diameter,TNM stage,histological type,and lymph node metastasis to compare differences in serumκFLC andλFLC levels.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum FLC alone and in combination with other indicators in lung cancer.Results:The expression levels of serum FLC(κ+λ)andκFLC were significantly higher in the lung cancer group than those in the control group(both P<0.001),while there was no significant difference in serumλFLC levels between the 2 groups(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in serumκFLC levels among lung cancer patients with different tumor diameters,histological types,or TNM stages(all P>0.05);however,serumκFLC levels were higher in lung cancer patients with lymph node metastasis than in those without,with statistical significance(P=0.033).There were no significant differences in serumλFLC levels based on tumor diameter or histological type(both P>0.05),but serumλFLC levels were higher in stage III+IV and ly

关 键 词:血清游离轻链 肺癌 诊断价值 癌胚抗原 细胞角蛋白-19片段抗原 

分 类 号:R734.2[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象