检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏加福 王丹[1] 张凤婷 徐保健 杜俞姵 SU Jiafu;WANG Dan;ZHANG Fengting;XU Baojian;DU Yupei(National Research Base of Intelligent Manufacturing Service,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,China;International College,Krirk University,Bangkok 10220,Thailand;School of Management,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650500,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆工商大学智能制造服务国际科技合作基地,重庆400067 [2]格乐大学国际学院,曼谷泰国10220 [3]云南师范大学管理学院,云南昆明650500
出 处:《计算机集成制造系统》2024年第9期3288-3298,共11页Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基 金:重庆市自然科学基金面上资助项目(CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0478);重庆市教育科学“十四五”规划年度资助项目(2021-GX-343);重庆市教委人文社会科学类研究资助项目(20SKGH110)。
摘 要:在现实群决策中,决策者常因信息不完全或社会排斥风险而表现出从众行为,同时通过情感移情效应感知他人情感,并将其观点纳入决策之中。但目前群决策研究鲜少考虑从众行为与移情关系的因素。为了拓展群决策的研究范畴和应用领域,提出一种多属性群决策方法,揭示了从众行为和移情关系对群决策的影响规律。首先,构建一个序贯决策分析框架,有效表达决策者从众行为对群决策的影响机制。随后,引入移情网络,对决策者的移情关系、感召力和知识能力三方面信息进行界定,进而探讨这些因素在决策过程中的作用效果。评估阶段的从众关系综合考虑了移情关系、感召力和知识能力;集结阶段的决策者权重受到感召力的影响,而时间点权重则由知识能力决定;在共识阶段,利用移情关系提出意见调整建议。最后通过实例研究说明,所提方法能够取得可靠且稳定的结果,并且相较于传统群决策方法,能更为高效地达成群体共识。In real-world group decision-making,decision makers often exhibit herd behavior due to incomplete information or the risk of social exclusion,and at the same time perceive the emotions of others through the affective empathy effect and incorporate their perspectives into their decisions.To expand the research scope and application field of group decision-making,a multi-attribute group decision-making method was proposed,which revealed the influence law of herd behavior and empathy relationship on group decision-making.A sequential decision analysis framework was constructed to effectively express the mechanism by which the decision maker s herd behavior influenced the group decision.Subsequently,an empathy network was introduced to define information on three aspects of decision maker's empathic relationship,evocative power and knowledge competence,which in turn explored the effect of these factors in the decision-making process.The herd relationship in the assessment phase combined empathy relationship,evocative power and knowledge competence;the decision-maker weights in the assembly phase were influenced by evocative power,while the point-in-time weights were determined by knowledge competence;in the consensus phase,empathy relationship was utilized to make suggestions for opinion adjustments.Finally,an example study illustrated that the proposed method was able to achieve reliable and stable results and was more efficient in reaching group consensus compared to traditional group decision-making methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200