思想政治教育学科边界的三大困境  

Three Dilemmas of Discipline Boundaries of Ideological and Political Education

作　　者：闫彩虹 施坚 YAN Cai-hong;SHI Jian(School of Marxism,Huaiyin Institute of Technology,Huaian,223003,Jiangsu)

机构地区：[1]淮阴工学院马克思主义学院,江苏淮安223003

出　　处：《南京开放大学学报》2024年第3期1-8,14,共9页Journal of Nanjing Open University

基　　金：2024年度淮阴工学院党建与思想政治工作研究课题“中华文化符号铸牢中华民族共同体意识的理论逻辑与实践路径研究”(2024DJSZB10)。

摘　　要：思想政治教育学科在40年的发展快车道上成绩斐然,已成为一门具有中国向度、中国特色、中国风格的意识形态“显学”。然而,在快速发展的同时,该学科也逐渐暴露出学科范围相对模糊、学科研究方法缺乏规范以及学科功能发挥错位等学科乱象,这在一定程度上模糊了思想政治教育学科边界的清晰度,也影响和制约了思想政治教育学科基础理论的进一步发展以及学科前沿难题的深涉和破解。因此,对思想政治教育学科困境的揭示,不仅有利于廓清学科边界所面临的现实问题,夯实学科边界研究的切入点,而且有利于构建学科边界研究的致思路向,推动学科基础理论发展。The discipline of ideological and political education has made remarkable achievements in its 40 years on the fast track of development,becoming a"prominent study"of ideology with Chinese dimensions,characteristics,and styles.However,alongside its rapid development,this discipline has gradually revealed issues such as a relatively vague scope,a lack of standardized methods,and the dislocation of discipline functions,which have blurred the clarity of discipline boundaries of ideological and political education to a certain extent and have impacted and constrained the further development of foundational theories as well as the in-depth exploration and resolution of cutting-edge challenges within the field.Therefore,revealing the dilemmas faced by the discipline of ideological and political education is not only beneficial for clarifying the realistic problems related to the discipline boundaries and solidifying the entry points for boundary research,but also contributes to constructing a direction for researching these boundaries and promoting the development of foundational theories in the discipline.

关 键 词：思想政治教育学科 学科边界 学科范围 学科研究方法 学科功能 

分 类 号：G641[文化科学—高等教育学]