检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任超[1] 孙瑜 REN Chao;SUN Yu(School of Economic Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)
出 处:《中国劳动关系学院学报》2024年第5期66-76,共11页Journal of China University of Labor Relations
摘 要:平台经济下劳动者逐渐以自雇者、经营者身份参与市场,传统的劳动关系认定机制已不能适配现状,劳动法与反垄断法的原有平衡面临崩解。完善集体劳动关系保护体系已达成国际共识,我国在实践中已取得一些成效,但集体劳权过度扩张带来的垄断风险亦值得警惕。研究认为,应在劳动法框架下明确集体协商的主体范围与政府定位,分阶段、分地区、分行业持续推进集体协商,并配套建立集体协商事前监督制度。同时,可参考域外实践重构反垄断劳工豁免制度,基于单一经济实体原则审查集体行动主体资格,通过反向排除的方式明确新业态从业者身份定位,并引入综合性审查、语境审查及实质性审查评价协商内容,规避集体劳权扩张可能导致的垄断风险。Under the platform economy,laborers increasingly participate in the market as the self-employed or business operators,which renders traditional labor relationship identification mechanisms inadequate.Thus,the original balance between labor law and antitrust law faces disruption.There is an international consensus on improving collective labor rights protection systems,whilst some progress has been made in practice in China.However,the risks of monopoly arising from excessive expansion of collective labor rights also warrant caution.This study suggests that it is necessary to clarify the range of subjects for collective bargaining and government positioning within the framework of labor law,progressively promote collective negotiations by phases,regions,and industries,and establish a pre-supervision system for collective negotiations.In addition,it also proposes to reconstruct the antitrust labor exemption system based on foreign practices,re-examine the qualifications of collective action subjects under the principle of a single economic entity,carry out comprehensive,contextual,and substantial reviews to assess negotiated content,thereby mitigating the monopoly risks associated with the expansion of collective labor rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.127.26