行政协议反向诉讼之容许性探析  

Analysis on the Tolerance of Reverse Litigation in Administrative Agreements

作　　者：孙琳琳 SUN Linlin(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430061,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430061

出　　处：《重庆科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第5期31-41,共11页Journal of Chongqing university of science and technology（social science edition）

基　　金：司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“基层治理视阈下政府间协议运用之实证研究”(22SFB3011)。

摘　　要：行政协议这种柔性行政管理方式的出现,挑战着行政相对人不履行协议情形下现有解纷渠道的合理性,进而追问反向诉讼制度的构建可能。其构建面临行政协议的实体识别难题、“民告官”的传统思维定式、已存在非诉执行的解决策略等困境。但与此对应的是,行政法律关系论、诉权平等理论、司法最终原则和全域性控权目的等又为突破困境提供了智识支撑。在行政诉讼整体大局观的考量下,行政协议反向诉讼制度的建构仍有待制度有效性和权利保护必要性的博弈,因此短期内不具备现实可能性,但其彰显出的制度优势有在新的变革契机中得以发挥的可能。The emergence of the flexible administrative management mode of administrative agreements challenges the rationality of the existing dispute resolution channel under the circumstance that the administrative counterpart does not perform the agreement,and then questions the possibility of the construction of reverse litigation system.Its construction is faced with the difficulties of entity identification of administrative agreements,the traditional thinking of“people suing the government”and the existing solution strategy of non-litigation execution.However,correspondingly,the relational theory of administrative laws,the theory of equality of litigation rights,the final principle of justice and the purpose of whole-domain control provide intellectual support for breaking through the dilemma.Against the background of an overall view of administrative litigation,the construction of the reverse litigation system of administrative agreements still expects the game between the effectiveness of the system and the necessity of rights protection.There is no realistic possibility in the short term,but the institutional advantages it demonstrates may be employed amidst the new opportunity of reform.

关 键 词：行政协议 反向行政诉讼 诉讼构造 行政诉讼原告 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]