检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郝世杰[1] 马山[1] 庄贺[1] 刘益成[1] 王万宏 邹建鹏 Hao Shijie;Ma Shan;Zhuang He;Liu Yicheng;Wang Wanhong;Zou Jianpeng(School of Rehabilitation Medicine,Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinan 250355,Shandong,China;Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinan 250000,Shandong,China)
机构地区:[1]山东中医药大学康复医学院,山东济南250355 [2]山东中医药大学附属医院,山东济南250000
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2024年第7期110-111,114,共3页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:山东中医药大学课程考试改革研究课题(2023KSGG35);山东中医药大学教学改革团队建设(JG2023035);山东中医药大学临床实践教学研究课题(ZT2023009)。
摘 要:目的:探讨TBL联合CBL教学法在心肺康复教学中的应用效果。方法:选取山东中医药大学2019级康复治疗专业两个班的学生为研究对象,随机设为对照组(52人)和试验组(54人)。对照组采用传统的讲授式教学法(LBL),试验组采用TBL联合CBL教学法。教学过程后,对两组学生进行理论知识和实践操作技能考核,并且通过自我满意度评价问卷调查学生的学习效果及对教学方法的满意度。结果:与对照组相比,试验组学生的实践操作考核成绩显著高于对照组(P<0.05),但理论考试成绩没有表现出明显的优势(P>0.05)。满意度调查问卷结果显示,试验组学生在提升团队合作意识、自主学习能力、分析/解决问题能力、对知识的掌握程度、资料检索能力方面取得显著成效,并且满意度优于对照组(P<0.05)。在提高学习效率方面,试验组满意度略高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在心肺康复教学中,TBL联合CBL教学法明显优于LBL教学法,取得了良好的教学效果,值得推广和应用。Objective:To explore the application effects of TBL(Team⁃Based Learning)combined with CBL(Case⁃Based Learning)teaching methods in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation education.Methods:Students from two classes majoring in rehabilitation therapy from the 2019 cohort at Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected as research subjects.They were randomly divided into a control group(52 students)and an experimental group(54 students).The control group adopted traditional lecture⁃based learning(LBL),while the experimental group adopted TBL combined with CBL teaching methods.After the teaching process,theoretical knowledge and practical skills were assessed in both groups.Additionally,a self⁃satisfaction questionnaire was used to evaluate the students'learning outcomes and their satisfaction with the teaching methods.Results:Compared to the control group,the experimental group's practical skills assessment scores were significantly higher(P<0.05),but there was no significant advantage in theoretical exam scores(P>0.05).The satisfaction survey results showed that the experimental group students significantly improved in team cooperation awareness,autonomous learning ability,problem⁃solving ability,knowledge mastery,and data retrieval ability,with satisfaction levels higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).In terms of improving learning efficiency,the experimental group's satisfaction was slightly higher than the control group's,but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:In cardiopulmonary rehabilitation education,the TBL combined with CBL teaching methods are significantly superior to the LBL teaching method,achieving good teaching results and worthy of promotion and application.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15