检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李梦琪[1] 胡荣[1] Li Mengqi;Hu Rong(Shengjing Hospital affiliated to China Medical University,Shenyang 110022,Liaoning,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院,辽宁沈阳110022
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2024年第7期118-119,共2页China Higher Medical Education
摘 要:目的:探讨后疫情时代雨课堂联合CBL教学方法在血液病教学中的应用效果。方法:将我校临床医学专业的学生分为试验组和对照组。试验组采用雨课堂联合CBL教学方法进行教学,对照组采用传统讲授式教学,通过期末试卷及调查问卷的方式评估雨课堂联合CBL教学方法的应用效果。结果:试验组的基础理论知识、病例分析以及总成绩均高于对照组(P<0.05);试验组学生的自学能力、理解能力、临床思维方面的得分也高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在血液病教学中,雨课堂联合CBL教学方法提高了学生的学习成绩、自学能力、理解能力和临床思维,是一次对线上教学方法的有意义的探索。Objective:To explore the effectiveness of the Rain Classroom combined with Case⁃Based Learning(CBL)teaching method in hematology teaching during the post⁃pandemic era.Methods:Students majoring in clinical medicine at our university were divided into experimental and control groups.The experimental group received teaching using the Rain Classroom combined with CBL method,while the control group received traditional lecture⁃based teaching.The effectiveness of the Rain Classroom combined with CBL method was evaluated through final exam scores and surveys.Results:The experimental group showed significantly higher scores in basic theoretical knowledge,case analysis,and overall grades compared to the control group(P<0.05).Scores in self⁃learning ability,comprehension,and clinical reasoning were also higher in the experimental group(P<0.05).Conclusion:In hematology teaching,the Rain Classroom combined with CBL method improves students'academic performance,self⁃learning ability,comprehension,and clinical reasoning.This study represents a meaningful exploration of online teaching methods in the post⁃pandemic era.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49