检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季政齐 JI Zhengqi(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042
出 处:《金华职业技术学院学报》2024年第4期66-70,共5页Journal of Jinhua Polytechnic
摘 要:理论上存在对金融诈骗罪独立设节违反传统理论关于犯罪分类标准的质疑。刑法分则各类犯罪的分类依据是同类法益。以金融信用为内容的“金融信用法益观”立足于金融信用在金融市场当中的地位,不仅为金融诈骗罪提供反映金融市场本质的法益概念,也对金融诈骗罪的不法本质进行阐释。金融诈骗罪与破坏金融管理秩序罪的保护法益不同,故金融诈骗罪独立设节没有违反传统理论关于犯罪分类的标准,在立法体系上具有合理性。In theory,there are doubts that the independent section of the crime of financial fraud violates the classification standard of the traditional theory.The classification of various crimes in the provisions of criminal law is based on similar legal interests.Based on the position of financial credit in the financial market,the"legal interest view of financial credit"not only provides the concept of legal interest that reflects the essence of financial market for the crime of financial fraud,but also explains the illegal nature of financial fraud.The law interests of the crime of financial fraud and the crime of destroying the order of financial management are different,so the independent section of the crime of financial fraud does not violate the standard of crime classification in the traditional theory,and it is reasonable in the legislative system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7