机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属人民医院中心实验室、镇江市精确诊断与治疗重点实验室,江苏镇江212002 [2]江苏大学附属人民医院血液内科,江苏镇江212002
出 处:《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》2024年第9期910-915,共6页Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81970156)。
摘 要:目的观察急性髓系白血病(AML)患者骨髓单个核细胞中circRNA-KRAS表达变化,探讨其与AML患者临床病理特征及预后的关系。方法2014年1月—2016年1月江苏大学附属人民医院诊治AML患者128例为AML组,同期行骨髓检查的非血液病患者30例为对照组,采用实时荧光定量PCR法检测2组骨髓单个核细胞circRNA-KRAS相对表达量;采用Spearman相关法分析AML患者circRNA-KRAS表达与血小板计数的相关性;绘制ROC曲线,评估circRNA-KRAS诊断AML的效能。AML患者均给予标准方案化疗,并根据circRNA-KRAS诊断AML的最佳截断值分为高表达组和低表达组,比较2组性别、年龄、白细胞计数、血红蛋白、血小板计数、骨髓原始细胞比例、FAB分型、染色体分型、诱导化疗后完全缓解比率;随访至2023年5月,比较2组无病生存期、总生存期。结果对照组circRNA-KRAS相对表达量[0.1635(0,1.0000)]高于AML组[0.0083(0,0.8462)](U=1.694,P=0.003)。128例AML患者血小板计数为46.5×10^(9)/L(19.0×10^(9)/L,78.5×10^(9)/L),circRNA-KRAS表达与血小板计数呈正相关(r=0.237,P=0.029)。circRNA-KRAS相对表达量以0.0563为最佳截断值,诊断AML的AUC为0.846(95%CI:0.767~0.925,P=0.007),灵敏度为83.3%,特异度为77.3%。128例患者中高表达组(circRNA-KRAS相对表达量≥0.0563)29例,低表达组(circRNA-KRAS相对表达量<0.0563)99例。低表达组血小板计数[30.0×10^(9)/L(19.0×10^(9)/L,57.0×10^(9)/L)]低于高表达组[48.0×10^(9)/L(27.0×10^(9)/L,78.5×10^(9)/L)](U=1.054,P=0.029),性别比例、年龄、白细胞计数、血红蛋白、骨髓原始细胞比例、FAB分型、染色体分型、诱导化疗后完全缓解比率与高表达组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。中位随访42个月,高表达组失访8例,低表达组失访19例,高表达组无病生存期[22.0(5.0,57.0)个月]、总生存期[32.0(14.5,73.5)个月]与低表达组[23.0(8.0,44.0)、25.5(12.0,48.0)个月]比较差异均无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.527,P=0.468;χ^Objective To observe the changes of circRNA-KRAS in bone marrow mononuclear cells of patients with acute myeloid leukemia(AML),and to explore its relationships with the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of AML patients.Methods From January 2014 to January 2016,128 AML patients(AML group)were diagnosed and treated in the Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University,and another 30 patients receiving bone marrow examination lue to non-hematological diseases at the same period were included as control group.The relative expression of circRNA-KRAS in bone marrow mononuclear cells was detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR in two groups.Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between circRNA-KRAS and blood platelet count.ROC curves were plotted to evaluate the efficiency of circRNA-KRAS on diagnosing AML.All AML patients were given standardized protocol chemotherapy.According to the optimal cut-off value of circRNA-KRAS on diagnosing AML,128 AML patients were divided into high expression group and low expression group,and the gender,age,white blood cell count,hemoglobin,platelet count,proportion of blasts in bone marrow,FAB classification,chromosome classification,and overall response rate after chemotherapy induction were compared between two groups.The follow up was conducted till May 2023,and the disease-free survival and overall survival were compared between high and low expression groups.Results The relative expression of circRNA-KRAS was higher in control group[0.1635(0,1.0000)]than that in AML group[0.0083(0,0.8462)(U=1.694,P=0.003)].The platelet count of 128 AML patients was 46.5×10^(9)/L(19.0×10^(9)/L,78.5×10^(9)/L),and circRNA-KRAS was positively correlated with platelet count(r=0.237,P=0.029).When using the optimal cut-off value of circRNA-KRAS of 0.0563,the AUC for diagnosing AML was 0.846(95%CI:0.767-0.925,P=0.007),the sensitivity was 83.3%,and the specificity was 77.3%.In 128 AML patients,circRNA-KRAS was≥0.0563 in 29 patients(high expression
关 键 词:急性髓系白血病 骨髓单个核细胞 circRNA-KRAS
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...