既判力标准时后形成权的行使研究  

Study on the Exercise of the Right of Formation after the Benchmark Time of Res Judicata

作　　者：杨书涵 Yang Shuhan(Law school,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《河北科技师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期53-62,共10页Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：西南政法大学法学院学生科研创新项目“既判力标准时后形成权行使的路径研究”(FXY2023060)。

摘　　要：相较于大陆法系依据遮断效理论处理既判力标准时后形成权的行使的方式,我国目前依据“一事不再理”处理该问题的方式会产生诉讼标的内涵的相对化以及既判力客观范围扩张的问题,引入大陆法系遮断效理论更加合理。为了实现遮断效理论处理标准时后形成权行使的规则建构,需要对我国现有重复起诉规则改造的基础上,利用原有的“实质否定”规则的功能建立起我国的遮断效判断标准,最终实现对标准时后形成权行使的实质性分析。Compared with the approach of the Continental legal system based on the theory of res judicata in the treatment of the exercise of the power formed after the establishment of the standard of judicial power,the current approach in China,based on the principle of“Non bis in idem”,will lead to the relative implications of the subject matter of the litigation and the expansion of the objective scope of res judicata.Therefore,it is more reasonable to introduce the theory of res judicata from the Continental legal system.In order to establish rules for the application of the theory of res judicata in the exercise of the power formed after the establishment of the standard,it is necessary to reform the existing rules on repeated litigation in China and utilize the function of the existing“substantive denial”rule to establish the criteria for the application of res judicata in China,ultimately achieving a substantive analysis of the exercise of the power formed after the standard is established.

关 键 词：既判力 形成权 遮断效 实质否定 重复起诉 一事不再理 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]