检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:强伟杰 陈国俊[1] 杜志刚[1] 陈伟锋 余亮 贝润钊 QIANG Weijie;CHEN Guojun;DU Zhigang;CHEN Weifeng;YU Liang;BEI Runzhao(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430063,Hubei,China;Jiangluo Branch,Guangdong Highway Construction Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510699,Guangdong,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉理工大学交通与物流工程学院,湖北武汉430063 [2]广东省公路建设有限公司江罗分公司,广东广州510699
出 处:《隧道建设(中英文)》2024年第9期1863-1873,共11页Tunnel Construction
基 金:国家自然科学基金(52072291)。
摘 要:为分析驾驶人在隧道入口区域的减速行为特征,并定量评价不同视线诱导设施的调节作用,开展模拟试验,基于日间自由流状态构建场景1(行业标准、对照组)、场景2(2.5 m立面标记)、场景3(环形立面标记)、场景4(多层次视线诱导系统)4组试验场景,采用开始减速位置、减速度变化率、油门开度变化率等指标进行分析。试验结果如下:1)驾驶人速度变化呈现“平稳—下降—较平稳”趋势;2)在行业标准下开始减速位置较近,导致需采取较大减速度、较少减速阶段实现车速下降,行车舒适度低于、操纵危险度大于其他场景;3)2.5 m立面标记与环形立面标记均能使驾驶人提前辨识洞门,行车舒适区间占比有所提升;4)多层视线诱导系统表现最优,开始减速位置提前65%,行车舒适区间提升最大(13.1%),且其采用的控制油门减速策略,平均油门开度最大(0.095)、油门操纵危险度最小(0.13),是入口区域较适宜的减速模式。试验结果表明:隧道入口洞门采用环形立面标记、增设多层次视线诱导系统有利于驾驶人早发现、早减速、缓减速,能显著提升隧道入口区域行驶安全性与舒适性。In this study,four test scenarios are established to analyze drivers′deceleration behavior at tunnel entrances during daytime free-flow conditions and quantitatively evaluate the regulating effects of different visual guiding facilities.The scenarios include:Scenario 1(control group with industry standards),Scenario 2(2.5-m elevation marker),Scenario 3(circular elevation marker),and Scenario 4(multi-level visual guiding system).The deceleration start position,changes in deceleration rate,and throttle opening rate are used as analytical indices.The test results show the following:(1)Drivers′speed patterns generally follow a stable-declining to relatively stable trend.(2)In Scenario 1,drivers began decelerating later,which lead to a more abrupt deceleration and a shorter deceleration stage,resulting in less driving comfort and higher control risk compared to other scenarios.(3)Scenarios 2 and 3 allow drivers to identify the tunnel portal earlier,thereby extending the driving comfort zone.(4)Scenario 4 performs the best,with the deceleration starting position 65%ahead of that in Scenario 1,and the driving comfort zone extends by 13.1%compared to Scenario 1.Furthermore,Scenario 4 achieves the highest average throttle opening(0.095)and the lowest throttle control risk(0.13),making it the most suitable deceleration mode for tunnel entrance areas.The test results demonstrate that using circular elevation markers at tunnel and a multi-level visual guiding system at tunnel entrances helps drivers detect the entrance earlier,start decelerating sooner,and decelerate slowly.This significantly improves driving safety and comfort in tunnel entrance areas.
关 键 词:高速公路隧道 交通安全 隧道入口区域 减速行为 视线诱导系统
分 类 号:U45[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147