安乐死的有限出罪研究  

The Research on the Limited Decriminalization of Euthanasia

作　　者：李淑娟[1] 王岩[1] Li Shujuan;Wang Yan(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《锦州医科大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第5期11-16,21,共7页Journal of Jinzhou Medical University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：消极安乐死在实务中有被界定为故意杀人罪的风险,对此,可参考德国判例,引入自我决定权作为消极安乐死的权利基础,并借助被害人承诺进行出罪。原则上,实施积极安乐死的行为不阻却违法性,应以故意杀人罪论处,但在量刑时可借助期待可能性理论,根据具体案情进行有限宽宥。在特定情形下,可通过规范适用但书条款,对积极安乐死做出无罪宣告的决定。In practice,the conduct of passive euthanasia carries the risk of being characterized as intentional homicide,and in this regard,one could refer to German case law for introducing the right to self-determination as the legal basis for passive euthanasia,and utilize the concept of victim's consent to exculpate such actions.As a principle,the performance of active euthanasia does not negate its illegality and should be treated as intentional homicide.However,during sentencing,the theory of expectant possibility can be employed to grant limited leniency based on the specific circumstances of the case.Under certain defined conditions,it is possible to apply exceptions within proviso clause to render a decision of acquittal for cases involving active euthanasia.

关 键 词：安乐死 出罪 但书 期待可能性 

分 类 号：R19[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] D9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]