检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖权东 段修尚 XIAO Quan-dong;DUAN Xiu-shang
机构地区:[1]广州商学院法学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2024年第10期70-75,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:我国刑法对聚众斗殴罪名以简单罪状规定,且尽管司法机关出台过一些司法解释,但仍有大量问题没有进行解释说明,导致在理论和实务界对某些情况判断标准不一,如行为人已实施聚众行为,但未实施斗殴行为的属于何种犯罪形态问题。应当在释清聚众斗殴犯罪性质的前提下,进一步结合案件中的具体情况,在法理与情理的充分融合中来精准把握斗殴双方行为的即时表现,从多重视角的类型分析来寻求妥当辨析犯罪形态的规范路径。可从聚众斗殴罪的性质以及聚众和斗殴两方面进行分析,行为人虽已聚众但未完成斗殴行为的应可成立犯罪预备、犯罪中止或犯罪未遂。China's criminal law provides a brief description of the crime of affray,and while judicial authorities have issued some interpretations,many issues remain unaddressed,leading to inconsistencies in theoretical and practical judgments.One such issue is the determination of the criminal pattern when individuals have gathered but have not engaged in fighting.Clarifying the nature of the crime of affray is essential to accurately assess the immediate actions of both parties in a case.This requires considering specific case details and blending legal theory with common sense.A multi-perspective typological analysis is needed to find appropriate normative paths for distinguishing different criminal patterns.By analyzing the nature of the crime of affray and examining both the gathering and the fighting aspects,it can be determined that if the perpetrator has gathered but not yet engaged in fighting,the crime may constitute preparation,suspension,or attempt.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.119.75