论网络平台私权力滥用的公法治理  

On the Public Law Governance of the Abuse of Private Power on Network Platforms

作　　者：杨宏韬 邢益精[1] YANG Hongtao;XING Yijing(Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 311199)

机构地区：[1]浙江理工大学,浙江杭州311199

出　　处：《浙江万里学院学报》2024年第5期42-49,共8页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University

基　　金：浙江理工大学课题“电子数据与人工智能相关法律问题咨询研究项目”(23250857-J)。

摘　　要：网络平台假借算法中立和服务协议的外衣大肆滥用私权力,给平台内用户的财产和隐私权益造成巨大损害。法官在审理此类纠纷时往往只是把平台视为普通的私法主体,而忽视了平台的公共属性,平台用户以滥用市场支配地位、管控措施欠缺程序正义、格式条款无效为由主张平台行为不合理通常难获支持。面对私法调节的局限性,应该借鉴公法机制和公法原理赋能平台生态。有必要引入公法中的正当程序原则和比例原则规范平台私权力的运行;加重平台运营公司对自身管控行为合法性的证明责任可以有效矫治平台用户在诉讼能力上的天然弱势;设置平台纠纷复议委员会有助于平台争议的实质性化解。The online platform,under the guise of algorithm neutrality and service agreements,wields its private power in ways that harm the property and privacy rights of its users.When disputes arise,judges tend to view platforms as ordinary private law subjects,overlooking their public implications.Platform users typically find it challenging to support their claims of unreasonable platform behavior based on abuse of market dominance,insufficient procedural justice in control measures,and the invalidity of standard clauses.Given the limitations of private law regulation,we should implement the mechanisms and principles of public law to empower the platform ecosystem.Introducing due process and proportionality in public law is crucial for regulating private power on platforms.Placing a higher burden of proof on the legality of regulatory actions by platform operating companies can address the inherent imbalance in litigation ability between platforms and users.Establishing a platform dispute review committee could greatly enhance the resolution of platform-related disputes.

关 键 词：社会行政 公法规制 平台私权力 服务协议 举证责任 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]