检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘相锋 廖文军 王岭 Liu Xiangfeng;Liao Wenjun;Wang Ling(The New Type Key Think Tank of Zhejiang Province“China Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy”,Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics;School of Economics,Xiamen University;School of Economics,Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics)
机构地区:[1]浙江财经大学中国政府监管与公共政策研究院 [2]厦门大学经济学院 [3]浙江财经大学经济学院
出 处:《经济科学》2024年第5期85-113,共29页Economic Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“‘双碳’目标下我国新型能源监管体系构建与监管政策优化研究”(项目编号:23&ZD102);国家自然科学基金青年项目“中国新能源补贴政策评价、精准补贴机制与激励性规制研究”(项目编号:72003168);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“中国新能源行业补贴进入与退出动态机制研究:以激励性管制为视角”(项目编号:18YJC790105)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:本文以第二轮限购政策为研究对象,使用中国热点城市2015年1月至2021年4月二手房市场数据作为研究样本,采用多期DID联立方程研究政策实施、公众预期与房价调控之间关系。研究发现:第一,限购政策无显著效果,且限价政策会导致新建住宅和二手房房价倒挂。第二,政府出台限购政策主要考虑市场交易量、房价以及公众预期三个方面,是基于房地产市场活跃程度、居民承受的房价压力和政府面对的社会压力做出的决策。第三,公众预期会存在两种效应,即非理性预期的直接效应和舆论压力引致政府非理性决策的间接效应。第四,二线城市、京津冀城市群以及土地财政依赖度较强的城市实施的限购政策效果较差。This paper takes the second round of purchase restriction policy as the research ob-ject,uses the second-hand housing market data of Chinese hotspot cities from January 2015 to April 2021 as the research sample,and adopts multi-period difference-in-differences(DID)sim-ultaneous equations to study the relationship between policy implementation,public expectation,and housing price regulation.The findings are as follows.(1)The purchase restriction policy has no significant effect,and the price restriction policy leads to the inversion of the prices of new houses and second-hand houses.(2)The government's introduction of the purchase restric-tion policy mainly takes into account the market transaction volume,housing prices,and public expectations,and is based on the active degree of the real estate market,the pressure on housing prices borne by residents,and the social pressure faced by the government.(3)There are two effects of public expectations,i.e.,the direct effect of irrational expectations and the indirect effect of public opinion pressure leading to the government's irrational decision-making.(4)Sec-ond-tier cities,the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration,and cities with a strong depend-ence on land finance have implemented a less effective purchase restriction policy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.150.104