“Radicalism”and“Conservatism”:The Philosophical Argument of Human Enhancement Technologies(HET)and Its Resolution  

作　　者：Yi Xianfei Liu Zhuang 

机构地区：[1]Center for Moral and Cultural Studies,School of Marxism,Hunan Normal University,Changsha,Hunan 410081,China [2]School of Marxism,Hunan International Economics University,Changsha,Hunan 410205,China

出　　处：《Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences》2024年第3期437-454,共18页复旦人文社会科学论丛（英文版）

基　　金：Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation:Research on Ethica Issues and Governance Strategies of Emerging Human Enhancement Technologies(Grant No.2024JJ5278).

摘　　要：The philosophical debate between“radicalism”and“conservatism”in emerging human enhancement technologies(HET)has never ceased.Although their theoreti-cal claims seem to be distinct from each other,they actually share certain common-alities,which are mainly manifested in three aspects:first,they both hold certain illusions about emerging HET;second,they both reflect the loss of human subjec-tivity in the debate;and third,they both leave the premise of their propositions in suspense.Based on the reflection and grasp of these commonalities,we can grasp the possible boundaries of the dissolution of the two oppositions:let HET be“where it is in,”reconfigure anthropocentrism,suspend metaphysical myths,and turn to the“reality of human beings.”

关 键 词：HET-Radicalism CONSERVATISM Philosophical controversy 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]