出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2024年第28期95-98,共4页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的 探讨口腔正畸治疗对牙周病致前牙移位患者牙覆盖距离及牙周袋深度的影响。方法 选取2020年1月至2022年1月我院收治的100例牙周病致前牙移位患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组(n=50)和观察组(n=50)。两组均接受常规牙周疾病治疗,对照组采用常规牙周夹板固定治疗,观察组采用口腔正畸治疗。比较两组的临床疗效、牙周指标、牙周指数及咀嚼功能。结果 观察组的治疗总有效率为96.00%,高于对照组的84.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组的牙周袋深度、牙槽骨高度及牙覆盖距离比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组的牙周袋深度、牙覆盖距离均小于治疗前,牙槽骨高度均大于治疗前,且观察组优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组的牙周探诊深度(PD)及龈沟出血指数(SBI)、牙龈指数(GI)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组的PD及SBI、GI评分均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组的咀嚼效能、咬合力比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组的咀嚼效能、咬合力均高于治疗前,且观察组高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 口腔正畸治疗可改善牙周病致前牙移位患者的牙周指数及咀嚼功能,治疗效果显著。Objective To investigate the effects of orthodontic treatment on tooth coverage distance and periodontal pocket depth in patients with anterior teeth displacement caused by periodontal disease.Methods A total of 100 patients with anterior teeth displacement caused by periodontal disease admitted in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected as the research objects.According to the random number table method,the patients were divided into control group(n=50)and observation group(n=50).Both groups received conventional periodontal disease treatment,the control group was treated with conventional periodontal splint fixation,and the observation group was treated with orthodontic treatment.The clinical efficacy,periodontal indicators,periodontal index and chewing function were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 96.00%,which was higher than 84.00%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no significant differences in periodontal pocket depth,alveolar bone height and tooth coverage distance between the two groups(P>0.05);after treatment,the periodontal pocket depth and tooth coverage distance of the two groups were smaller than those before treatment,the alveolar bone height was greater than that before treatment,those of the observation group were better than the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no significant differences in probing depth(PD),sulcus bleeding index(SBI)and gingival index(GI)scores between the two groups(P>0.05);after treatment,the PD,SBI and GI scores of the two groups were lower than those before treatment,those of the observation group were lower than the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no significant differences in masticatory efficiency and bite force between the two groups (P>0.05);after treatment, the masticator
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...