《庄子·齐物论》中的自然-文化符号关系——基于“以明”概念的符号分析  

The Symbolic Relation of Nature and Culture in Zhuangzi.Qiwu Lun:Symbolic Analysis Based on the Concept of"Yiming"

作　　者：孙宣 Sun Xuan(School of Literature(Zhuhai),Sun Yat-sen University)

机构地区：[1]中山大学中文系(珠海)

出　　处：《符号与传媒》2024年第2期74-85,共12页Signs & Media

摘　　要：庄子反复言明,“以明”是他对人类如何经验自然、认识自然与文化符号关系问题的主要观点。庄子解构了人与自然的二元关系,“以明”意指人类主体性降落而归到自然与文化符号的中枢之处。身体连接内世界与外世界,庄子以为,通过身体“虚静”“心斋”“丧我”等方式建立自然与文化之间的符号关系,身体经由“物化”可通“明”境。“以明”也存在于指物的语言符号过程中,但人类永远无法通过语言抵达,只有在指物符号过程中努力展现“物自体”的秩序,才能不断接近“以明”,这个过程也展现了自然与文化之间的连续性。本文从中西对话的视角分析“以明”,认为“以明”并非一种形而上学观,其中蕴含了自然-文化的复杂关系,体现出生态符号学思想。Zhuangzi repeatedly claimed that“yiming”was how people experience nature and understand the relation between nature and cultural signs.Zhuangzi deconstructed the binary relationship between man and nature,while“yiming”signified the descent of human subjectivity to the“centre”of nature and cultural signs.The body connects the inner world with the external world.Zhuangzi believed that the semiotic relationship between nature and culture could be established through the body's“cmpty tranqullity”,“mind fasting”and“self-loss”,The body can reach a state of“ming”through“materialisation”“Yiming”also exists in the process of linguistic symbols pointing to objects,but human can never reach it through language.Only by striving to show the order of“things in themselves”in the semiotic process of pointing to objects can we continuously approach“yiming”.This process also shows the synechism between nature and culture.This article analyses“yiming”from the perspective of dialogue between China and the West,arguing that“yiming”is not a metaphysical view but contains the complex relationship between nature and culture and reflects the idea of eco-semiotics.

关 键 词：《庄子》 “以明” 自然-文化 符号 生态符号学 

分 类 号：B223.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]