从对立到融通:经史关系研究的视角转换与范式重构  

From Opposition to Accommodation: Perspective Transformation and Paradigm Reconstructionin Study of Relationship between Confucian Classics and Historiography

作　　者：黄海涛[1] HUANG Haitao(Institute of History and Literature,Yunnan Academy of Social Sciences,Kunming 650034,China)

机构地区：[1]云南省社会科学院历史、文献研究所,昆明650034

出　　处：《长春大学学报》2024年第9期60-66,共7页Journal of Changchun University

基　　金：云南省社会科学规划培育项目(PY202205)。

摘　　要：经史关系研究领域有一种很有代表性的观点,认为经学和史学是此消彼长的对立关系。但对照经学和史学发展的轨迹,可以看出这种对立关系其实并不存在。之所以会出现这种观点,主要原因是古代有关经史关系的讨论一直集中在经史尊卑问题上,“经学盛则史学衰”实质上是这类传统议题的延续。当前研究经史关系问题,不能局限在比高下、较盛衰的传统研究范式中,必须及时转换研究视角,把关注点放在经史之间的相互联系和影响上。There is a very representative view in the field of the study of the relationship between Confucian classics and historiography,which holds that Confucian classics and historiography are opposite.However,compared with the track of the development of Confucian classics and historiography,it is found that this opposition does not exist in fact.The main reason is that the discussion about the relationship between Confucian classics and historiography has been focused on the issue of the superiority or inferiority.That the prosperity of Confucian classics means the decline of historiography is essentially a continuation of such traditional issues.At present,the study of the relationship between Confucian classics and historiography should not be confined to the traditional research paradigm,and it is necessary to change the research perspective in time and focus on the interconnection and influence between them.

关 键 词：汉代 经史关系 研究范式 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]