为什么不宜将史上人类生产型开发活动视作环境破坏行为  

Why Historical Human Production-oriented Development Should Not Be Viewed as Environmental Destruction

作　　者：侯甬坚 Hou Yongjian

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学西北历史环境与经济社会发展研究院,陕西西安720119

出　　处：《鄱阳湖学刊》2024年第5期51-63,F0002,156,157,共16页Journal of Poyang Lake

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目;复旦大学历史地理研究中心“十四五”规划项目“数字时代的中国西部环境变化中人的作用研究”(编号:22JJD770020)。

摘　　要：“人类活动”一词系学术界对地球上所有人的活动采用的一种宽泛表述。有鉴于人类活动在历史研究中的重要性,学者们已有相应的专题及分类研究,其中不少研究在环境保护思潮兴起之时,由于接触到历史上人类生产型开发活动对自然环境造成的种种负面影响,故在论述中忽略人类活动具有创造社会物质财富以及推动历史不断发展的作用,以致淡忘中国人已在中华大地休养生息数千年的经历,尤其是在历史上数量庞大的人口与社会兴衰的关系问题上出现了模糊的认识,亟需辨识清楚。2023年在自然地理学领域内“人类生存环境学”这一新学科的提出,适时指明诸多学科应立意高远,着眼于人类起源、演进、发展大势中的生存问题,在“中国人的生存环境史”研究中作出新的探索。The term“human activities”is a general expression used in academia to describe the actions of all people on Earth.Given the importance of human activities in historical research,scholars have conducted specialized and categorized studies.Many of these studies,influenced by the rise of environmental protection movements,have focused on the negative impacts of historical human production-oriented development on the natural environment.As a result,they have often overlooked the role of human activities in creating material wealth for society and driving historical progress,and have even neglected China's long history of sustaining its population on its land for thousands of years,particularly blurring the relationship between the large population throughout history and the rise and fall of society.It is imperative to clarify this understanding.In 2023,the introduction of a new discipline,“Earth's livability”within the field of physical geography,timely pointed out that many disciplines should take a broader perspective,focusing on survival issues within the grand context of human origins,evolution,and development.This opens up new avenues for exploring the history of the living environments of the Chinese people.

关 键 词：人类生产型开发活动 环境破坏论 人类生存环境学 

分 类 号：X24[环境科学与工程—环境科学]