检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晓东[1] 孙莉 Wang Xiaodong;Sun Li(School of Public Security Management,Shandong Police College,Jinan,Shandong,250200People’s Procuratorate of Yantai Economic and Technological Development Zone,)
机构地区:[1]山东警察学院教务处,山东济南250200 [2]烟台市开发区人民检察院,山东烟台264006
出 处:《山东警察学院学报》2024年第3期30-37,共8页Journal of Shandong Police College
基 金:公安部公安理论与软科学计划项目“国家治理体系治理能力现代化视阈下涉众型经济犯罪防治研究”(项目编号:2020LLYJSDST072)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:当前,非法集资式传销犯罪已成为组织、领导传销活动罪的主流样态,组织、领导传销活动罪与非法吸收公众存款罪、集资诈骗罪的罪名竞合态势愈演愈烈,而现有司法解释以想象竞合犯处理的做法既不能消弭法律争议,也不能解决司法部门面临的实务难题。其根本原因在于传销犯罪的样态扩张,导致侵害法益重点迁移。需要明晰传销犯罪本质,精准“靶向”当下重点法益,通过立法修改解决相关罪名竞合问题,实现真正意义上的罪刑均衡。Currently,illegal fundraising pyramid schemes have become the predominant form of organizing and leading pyramid scheme crimes.The overlap between this crime and offenses such as illegal acceptance of public deposits and fundraising fraud continues to intensify.Existing judicial interpretations,treating these as imaginative joiner of offense,fail to resolve legal disputes and practical challenges faced by judicial authori-ties.This issue arises from the multiple forms of pyramid scheme activities,shifting the focus of protected legal interests.There is a need to clarify the essence of pyramid scheme crimes and precisely target key legal inter-ests.Legislative amendments are necessary to address the concurrence of related offenses and achieve genuine balance between crime and punishment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171