监督过失刑事规制的分析与思考  

Analysis and Thinking of Supervision Negligence Criminal Regulation

作　　者：郭昊明 丁华宇[2] Guo Haoming;Ding Huayu(Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450001;Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou,Henan 450016)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学,河南郑州450001 [2]河南财经政法大学,河南郑州450016

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2024年第3期56-61,40,共7页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

摘　　要：我国刑法对监督过失类犯罪没有明确规定,司法实务中对监督过失的实行行为认定和刑事归责判断存在争议。从新过失论视角看,监督过失处于不法层面、具有不作为性和双重义务性。监督过失犯罪行为的本质是以结果避免可能性为核心的过失。监督过失在刑事规制的具体归责方法上,新过失论与客观归责理论具有重合性,可在新过失论视角下以客观归责理论对监督过失进行刑事规制。The criminal law of our country has no clear provisions on the crime of supervision negligence.In the judicial practice,there are disputes on the identification of the implementation of supervision negligence and the judgment of criminal responsibility.From the perspective of the new negligence theory,the supervisory negligence is in the illegal level,has the character of omission and double obligation.The essence of supervision negligent criminal behavior is the negligence with the possibility of result avoidance as the core.In the concrete imputation methods of supervision negligence in criminal regulation,the theory of new negligence overlaps with the theory of objective imputation,which can be applied to criminal regulation of supervision negligence from the perspective of new negligence theory.

关 键 词：新过失论 监督过失 结果预见可能性 结果避免可能性 客观归责 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]