检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张芳静 曹丽 余梅先 Zhang Fangjing;Gao Li;Yu Meixian(Neurology Ward 2,Anhui Second People’s Hospital,Hefei 230011,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽省第二人民医院神经内科二病区,安徽合肥230011
出 处:《现代科学仪器》2024年第5期133-137,共5页Modern Scientific Instruments
基 金:安徽省卫计委科研课题(编号:2018SEYL024)。
摘 要:目的:探讨知信行模式对脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者的干预效果。方法:选取安徽省第二人民医院84例脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者,随机分为对照组和干预组,分别给与常规干预和知信行模式干预,为期3个月。评估干预前后患者知识、信念、行为评分,吞咽功能以及生存质量。结果:干预后,干预组知信行评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05),吞咽功能优良率90.48%,明显高于对照组的71.43%(P<0.05),生存质量各领域评分及总分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:知信行模式干预可显著提高脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者的知识、信念、行为水平,改善吞咽功能,提升生存质量。Objective:To investigate the efficacy of the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice(KAP)model in intervening with post-stroke dysphagia patients.Method:A total of 84 patients with post-stroke dysphagia from Anhui Second People's Hospital were randomly divided into a control group and an intervention group,receiving conventional intervention and KAP model intervention respectively,for a duration of 3 months.The assessments included knowledge,attitude,and practice scores,swallowing function,and quality of life before and after the intervention.Results:Following the intervention,the knowledge,attitude,and practice scores of the intervention group were significantly higher(P<0.05).The excellent and good rate of swallowing function in the intervention group was 90.48%,notably higher than the 71.43%of the control group(P<0.05).Post-intervention,the intervention group showed higher scores in all domains of quality of life(P<0.05).Conclusion:The intervention based on the KAP model significantly enhances the knowledge,attitude,and practice levels of post-stroke dysphagia patients,improves swallowing function,and elevates their quality of life.
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7