诉源治理视阈下我国强制调解制度构建:挑战与因应  

Construction of compulsory mediation system from the perspective of litigation source governance:challenges and responses

作　　者：谌锦华 SHEN JINHUA(Law School Guizhou University,Guiyang Guizhou550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《西安电子科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期96-105,共10页Journal of Xidian University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：贵州大学人文社会科学项目:“我国高校学术纠纷多元化解决机制探究”,项目编号:GDYB202005。

摘　　要：强制调解应界定为调解程序前置而非调解结果强制。强制调解在理论界论争多年,其强制性与调解自愿性形成的鸿沟难以弥合,诉源治理和强制调解之间耦合为其制度实现提供了正当性和可能性,强制调解有利于将矛盾纠纷分流处置和高效化解,进而实现对诉源治理的因应。但构建强制调解制度还存在法理挑战、适用对象挑战、运作挑战等问题须正视,需要从法理的角度阐释其正当性以打破思想壁垒;明确适用程序和对象以消解适用顾虑;另外还要构建监督机制和优化调解制度进一步为其运作提优,多措并举后方可慎重考虑让强制调解跨越理论和实践沟壑。Compulsory mediation should be defined as pre-mediation procedure rather than compulsory mediation outcome.Compulsory mediation has been discussed in the theoretical circle for many years,and the gap between compulsory mediation and voluntary mediation is difficult to bridge.The coupling between the source of litigation governance and compulsory mediation provides legitimacy and possibility for the implementation of its system.Compulsory mediation is conducive to the diversion and efficient resolution of conflicts and disputes,so as to realize the response to the source of litigation governance.However,the construction of compulsory mediation system still has legal challenges,challenges of application objects,operational challenges,and so on.It is necessary to explain its legitimacy from the legal perspective to break down ideological barriers.Applicable procedures and objects need to be clarified to resolve applicable concerns.In addition,it is necessary to construct supervision mechanism and optimize mediation system to further improve its operation,and only after taking multiple measures can we seriously consider making compulsory mediation cross the gap between theory and practice.

关 键 词：诉源治理 强制调解 纠纷解决 权利保障 

分 类 号：D925.114[政治法律—诉讼法学]