新休谟“新”在哪里?  

What is“New”in The New Hume?

作　　者：孔新峰 铁小茜 KONG Xinfeng;TIE Xiaoxi

机构地区：[1]山东大学马克思主义学院,山东济南250100 [2]中央民族大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2024年第5期10-16,共7页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金特别委托项目“从‘一个结合’到‘两个结合’的战略考量和内在逻辑”(24@ZH011)。

摘　　要：传统的观点认为休谟是一位怀疑论者,即认为休谟怀疑或否定外部世界存在着客观的因果联系。与这种传统观点不同,作为休谟研究的一股新思潮,新休谟派坚持认为休谟是一位实在论者,我们的因果观念来源于外部世界。新休谟派主张的“新休谟”之“新”并非新在其基本观点,因为其基本观点早在新休谟派作为一种思潮兴起之前就存在了。新休谟之“新”主要表现在新的实在论、新的文本解释和新的文本根据。新休谟派的新解释并不完全令人信服,这种新解释也不符合休谟彻底经验主义的根本立场,但这种新解释推动了休谟研究的进展和人们对休谟因果问题的理解。The traditional view considers Hume to be a skeptic,suggesting that he doubts or denies the existence of objective causal relationships in the external world.Contrary to this traditional perspective,a new trend in Hume studies,known as the New Humean school,maintains that Hume is a realist and that our concept of causation originates from the external world.The“new”aspect of the New Humean interpretation does not lie in its fundamental views,as these basic ideas existed before the emergence of the New Humean trend as a distinct movement.Instead,the novelty of the New Humean approach is primarily reflected in a new form of realism,new textual interpretations,and new textual foundations.Although the New Humean interpretation is not entirely convincing and does not align with Hume s fundamental stance of thorough empiricism,it has advanced Hume studies and enhanced the understanding of Hume s views on causality.

关 键 词：休谟 新休谟 因果力量 怀疑论 实在论 

分 类 号：B561.291[哲学宗教—外国哲学]