“适合性”是否优先于“理由”?——论规范性的“适合性优先”与“理由优先”之争  

Is Fittingness Prior to Reasons?:On the Debate Between“Fittingness-First”and“Reason-First”Theories on Normativity

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈子衿 CHEN Zijin

机构地区:[1]武汉大学哲学学院,湖北武汉430072

出  处:《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2024年第5期26-31,共6页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University

摘  要:在元伦理学领域中,围绕什么是具有优先地位的规范性概念,哲学家们形成了许多讨论。其中,“理由优先论”与“适合性优先论”是两种较有潜力的进路。一些人试图通过“恶魔论证”的情境,表明我们更应该接受适合性优先论。然而,在对理由概念进行深入分析后,我们会发现,“恶魔论证”并不能打败理由优先论。适合性优先论虽然在一些方面取得了成功,但该理论可能并不如其支持者所声称的那样,可以完美地替代理由优先论。In the field of metaethics,philosophers have engaged in numerous discussions regarding what constitutes a normative concept with priority.Among them,“reason-first theory”and“fittingness-first theory”are two promising approaches.Some individuals attempt to argue for the acceptance of fittingness-first theory through the scenario of the“devil s advocate”.However,upon conducting a thorough analysis of the concept of reason,we will find that the devil s advocate argument fails to defeat reason-first theory.Fittingness-first theory has achieved success in certain aspects,but it may not be able to perfectly replace reason-first theory as claimed by its proponents.

关 键 词:理由 适合性 优先性 

分 类 号:B82-0[哲学宗教—伦理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象