检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘和旺[1] 罗勇 郑世林 LIU He-wang;LUO Yong;ZHENG Shi-lin(School of Business,Hubei University,Wuhan Hubei 430062,China;Chinese Association of Quantitative Economics,Beijing 100732,China;Institute of Quantitative and Technological Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China)
机构地区:[1]湖北大学商学院,湖北武汉430062 [2]中国数量经济学会,北京100732 [3]中国社会科学院数量经济与技术经济研究所,北京100732
出 处:《内蒙古社会科学》2024年第5期161-171,F0003,共12页Inner Mongolia Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“‘双碳’目标下资源型城市工业绿色转型与稳增长协同路径研究”(编号:22BJL049);中国社会科学院经济大数据与政策评估实验室项目(编号:2024SYZH004);国家自然科学基金面上项目“重点实验室建设对企业自主创新突破的激励效应:理论机制与经验证据”(编号:72474224)。
摘 要:在“双碳”目标下,ESG体系建设是企业实现高质量可持续发展的必由之路。基于地级市中级人民法院设立环保法庭这一准自然实验,以2009年至2022年沪深上市公司为研究样本,借助双重差分模型实证分析了环境司法强化对企业ESG表现的影响。研究发现,环保法庭的设立对企业ESG表现具有显著提升作用,即环境司法强化对企业可持续发展具有推动作用,且此作用具有长期性。异质性检验发现,在法治环境较好、司法独立性较强、环境执法强度较高的地区,环保法庭对企业ESG表现的提升作用更为明显;有过诉讼或环保行政处罚经历、数字化转型程度较高、环境绩效较低的企业及非国有企业,环保法庭对企业ESG表现的影响效应更大。机制分析发现,环保法庭可以通过促进企业环境治理加强、社会关注提升和信息披露水平提高来实现企业ESG表现的提升。Under the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality,ESG construction is the only way for enterprises to achieve high-quality and sustainable development.This article uses the quasi-natural experiment of setting up environmental protection courts by intermediate people's courts in prefecture level cities,and takes listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2022 as research samples.Using a difference-in-differences model,it empirically studies the impact of environmental justice on corporate ESG performance.Research has found that the establishment of environmental courts has a significant improvement effect on the ESG performance of enterprises,that is,environmental justice has a promoting effect on the sustainable development of enterprises,and this effect is long-term.This conclusion still holds after a series of robustness analyses such as parallel trend testing,endogeneity discussion,and heterogeneity testing of multi period difference-in-differences policy effects.Heterogeneity testing finds that in regions with a better legal environment,stronger judicial independence,and stronger law enforcement,environmental courts have a more significant effect on improving corporate ESG performance.Having experience in litigation or environmental administrative penalties,having a high degree of digital transformation,low environmental performance,and the effect of environmental courts on ESG performance in non-state-owned enterprises is greater.Mechanism analysis reveals that environmental courts can enhance corporate ESG performance by promoting stronger environmental governance,increasing social attention,and improving information disclosure levels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7