信息时代刑事追诉权力转移的法治保障  

Legal Guarantee for the Transfer of Criminal Prosecution Power in Information Age

作　　者：廖建灵 Liao Jianling

机构地区：[1]北京外国语大学法学院

出　　处：《青少年犯罪问题》2024年第5期98-109,共12页Issues on Juvenile Crimes and Delinquency

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“数字时代刑事司法的不适与调整”(项目编号:2024JX010)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：信息革命作用于刑事司法致使权力发生了转移,经由技术转移、通过第三方参与转移是权力转移的两种主要路径。然而,与传统法律赋权的路径不同,前述权力转移引发了法治化风险,在权力专属原则、权力制约机制、权利保障要求等方面形成了挑战。在时代的变化中,刑事司法应有所变亦应有所不变,关键在于坚持人的主体地位并为刑事司法的变化提供法治化的路径和保障。面对刑事司法权力的转移,通过合理界定他方力量嵌入司法的边界,适当考虑他方主体参与司法的责任,调整完善权力制约及权利保障机制,为新主体参与刑事司法、享有和行使权力提供法治保障。The effect of information revolution on criminal justice has led to the transfer of power,the two main ways of power transfer are through technology transfer and through the participation of a third party.However,different from the path of traditional legal empowerment,the aforementioned power transfer has caused concerns about legalization,and has posed challenges in the aspects of exclusive power principle,power restriction mechanism and rights protection requirements.However,in the change of the times,criminal judicature should change and remain unchanged.The key lies in adhering to the human subject status and providing the path and guarantee of the rule of law for the change of criminal judicature.In the face of the transfer of criminal judicial power,the legal guarantee can be provided for new subjects to participate in criminal justice and enjoy and exercise their power by reasonably defining the boundary of the power of other parties embedded in the judiciary,properly considering the responsibility of other parties to participate in the judiciary,adjusting and improving the power restriction and right protection mechanism.

关 键 词：权力转移 主体地位 权力制约 法治保障 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]