行政公益诉讼中行政机关履职标准判断——以安全生产领域案件为考察对象  

Judgment of Administrative Performance Standardsin Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation——Based on the Cases in the Field of Production Safety

作　　者：翟业虎[1] ZHAI Yehu(Law School,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China)

机构地区：[1]首都经济贸易大学法学院,北京100070

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第5期76-88,共13页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：最高人民检察院理论研究课题“安全生产公益诉讼新问题研究”(GJ2022C24)。

摘　　要：安全生产事故引发社会各界对检察院在安全生产领域提起公益诉讼的重点关注。对安全生产领域公益诉讼行政机关履职审查基准进行专门研究具有必要性,如何判断行政机关是否依法履职是当前检察公益诉讼实践公认的难题,当前多以“行为标准”“结果标准”和“复合标准”进行讨论。鉴于安全生产事故的严重危害性,在判断行政机关是否履行职责时,应重点从其客观上是否阻碍危害结果发生或是否遏制潜在危害源的视角出发,从其是否调尽行政资源方面进行审查,以此构建修正“行为-结果”判断标准,结合安全生产领域公益诉讼法律本质、宗旨及功能,不断改进完善行政机关整体履行职责的判断基准。A series of production safety accidents,breaking out recently,has aroused the public concern about the procuratorial public interest litigation in the field of production safety.It is necessary to conduct a special study on the standards of performance assessment of the administrative organizations.The“standards”issue is a well-acknowledged difficulty in procuratorial litigation practice.The contemporary standards often resorted to are mostly based on behaviour,outcome,or the composite framework.In view of the severe detriment of production safety accidents,our focus should be put on whether the administrative organizations have objectively hindered the occurrence of the detriment or contained its potential sources,and on whether the administrative organizations have objectively taken advantage of all possible administrative resources in their inspection.In this way,we can build up a remedial“behaviour-outcome”standard coupled with the legal nature,purpose and function of public interest litigation.

关 键 词：安全生产 行政公益诉讼 不依法履行职责 履职手段 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]