迈向多元:系统论法学作为国际法的方法  

Towards Diversity:Systems Theory as a Methodology in International Law

作　　者：毕莹[1] 何剑波 Bi Ying;He Jianbo

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院

出　　处：《国际经济法学刊》2024年第3期1-14,共14页Journal of International Economic Law

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“国有企业国际造法走向及我国的对策研究”(20BFX200);浙江省法学会重点课题“自贸试验区制度型开放问题研究——以与RCEP对接为切入点”(2021NA04);浙江省之江青年课题研究经费的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：面对百年未有之大变局,中国国际法学界应当更加深入地思考国际法方法论问题。方法论的变革,往往是国际法研究范式变革的前奏。在讨论“全球化”时,国际法的研究范式往往定位于主体“国家”之上,分析与经济、法律全球化等相伴的各种“去国家化”问题。当代社会系统论法学大师贡塔·托依布纳从“社会宪治”理论中获得核心启发,试图以一种超越国家—政治中心色彩的范式观察各种与“全球化”相关的新兴现象,可在“国家的离开→国家的回归→国际法的未来”三阶段行动轨迹等经典叙事之外,增添一种方法视角,为国际法学者范式转型提供一种法社会学进路,也为中国国际法提供超越传统西方中心主义视角下国际法方法论局限的一些启示。Experiencing a transformative era unparalleled in the last century,the Chinese international law community should delve deeper into the methodological underpinnings of international law.Transformations in methodology frequently herald paradigm shifts within the field of international law.In discussions on‘globalization’,international law's research paradigms commonly elevate the‘nation-state’as a primary subject,examining various‘denationalization’phenomena that arise alongside economic and legal globalization.Gunther Teubner,an eminent scholar of sociological jurisprudence,drawing pivotal inspiration from the theory of‘societal constitutionalism’,endeavors to observe the myriad emerging phenomena associated with‘globalization’through a paradigm that transcends state-centric and political perspectives.This novel approach not only adds a methodological dimension beyond the classical narratives of‘the departure of the state→the return of the state→the future of international law’,but also paves a sociological legal pathway for the transformation of paradigms among international law scholars.Furthermore,it provides insights that challenge the limitations of traditional Western-centric views on international law methodologies.

关 键 词：系统论 社会宪治 全球治理 涉外法治 统筹 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]