检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庄秀雅 黄姣[2] 李静 白远亮 徐凌[4] ZHUANG Xiuya;HUANG Jiao;LI Jing;BAI Yuanliang;XU Ling(Department of Periodontal and Oral Mucosa,Chongqing Medical University School of Stomatology/Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases/Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education,Chongqing 400000,China;Department of Periodontology,Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University/Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases/Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education,Chongqing 400000,China;Department of Stomatology,Chengdu Pidu District People′s Hospital,Chengdu Sichuan 610000,China;Department of Prosthodontic,Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University/Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases/Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education,Chongqing 400000,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学口腔医学院/口腔疾病研究重庆市重点实验室/重庆市高校市级口腔生物医学工程重点实验室牙周粘膜教研室,重庆400000 [2]重庆医科大学附属口腔医院/口腔疾病研究重庆市重点实验室/重庆市高校市级口腔生物医学工程重点实验室牙周科,重庆400000 [3]成都市郫都区人民医院口腔科,四川成都610000 [4]重庆医科大学附属口腔医院/口腔疾病研究重庆市重点实验室/重庆市高校市级口腔生物医学工程重点实验室修复科,重庆400000
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2024年第19期109-113,共5页China Health Standard Management
基 金:重庆市渝北区科技计划项目(2021农社21)。
摘 要:目的将牙周美学感知量表(periodontal aesthetic perception scale,PAPS)进行汉化,并对其信度和效度进行评价。方法2022年1—2月重庆医科大学附属口腔医院将PAPS进行汉化形成中文版量表。使用该表在2022年3月—2023年6月对165例在成都市郫都区人民医院口腔科就诊的符合纳入排除标准的研究对象(55例牙龈退缩患者,55例牙龈增生患者和55例牙龈健康者)进行调查,并对调查结果进行统计分析,考评量表的信度和效度。结果共发放问卷165份,回收153份,回收率为92.7%。量表的克朗巴赫α系数为0.793,组内相关系数总分值为0.894。从量表中提取2个公因子,累积贡献率达70.170%,因子负荷0.740~0.861。公因子在各个项目中占有较大的因子载荷值,说明量表之间存在着较大的联系。牙周美学感知量表总分及2个维度(生理效能与审美效能)评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),表明量表的判别效度良好。结论通过对PAPS中文版量表进行性能测试,显示该量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于中国有牙周美学问题患者的评估。Objective To sinicize periodontal aesthetic perception scale(PAPS)and evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods In January and February 2022,PAPS was sinicized into Chinese version of the scale at Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.Using this table,a survey was conducted from March 2022 to June 2023 on 165 study subjects(55 patients with gingival recession,55 patients with gingival hyperplasia,and 55 healthy gums)who visited the Department of Stomatology at Pidu District People′s Hospital in Chengdu.The survey results were statistically analyzed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale.Results A total of 165 questionnaires were distributed and 155 were recovered,with a recovery rate of 93.9%.The Kronbachαcoefficient of the scale is 0.793,and the total score of the within-group correlation coefficient is 0.894.Two common factors were extracted from the scale,the cumulative contribution rate reached 70.170%,and the factor load ranged from 0.740 to 0.861,and the common factor accounted for a large factor load value in each item,indicating that there was a large relationship between the scales.The total score of periodontal aesthetic perception scale and the difference in scores of two dimensions(Aesthetic efficacy and physiological efficacy)were statistically significant(P<0.05),indicating that the discriminant validity of the scale was good.Conclusion The performance test of PAPS Chinese version of the scale shows that the scale has great reliability and validity,and can be used for the evaluation of patients with periodontal aesthetic problems in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.30.154