自洗钱行为入刑后的司法适用问题研究  

A Study on Judicial Application of Self Money Laundering After Its Imprisonment

作　　者：袁淑娟 YUAN Shu-juan(Law School,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《湖北职业技术学院学报》2024年第4期70-74,共5页Journal of Hubei Polytechnic Institute

摘　　要：针对上游犯罪与洗钱罪的竞合问题,自洗钱行为具有独立的法益侵害性,应该坚持数罪并罚原则。针对共同犯罪问题,应该坚持主客观相一致原则,根据上游犯罪行为人与洗钱行为人通谋时间与通谋内容进行具体分析。针对处罚平衡问题,在上游犯罪不构成犯罪的情况下,洗钱行为也不应该构成犯罪,但如果是上游行为达到刑法规定的犯罪程度还没有定罪的情况,则下游行为可以构罪。针对自洗钱行为的量刑问题,应该把握上下游处罚平衡原则,对洗钱罪的处罚不应该超过对上游犯罪处罚的严重程度。In response to the competition between upstream crimes and money laundering crimes,self money laundering behavior has independent legal infringement and should adhere to the principle of combined punishment for multiple crimes.In response to the issue of joint crimes,the principle of subjective and objective consistency should be adhered to,and specific analysis should be made based on the time and content of collusion between upstream criminals and money laundering perpetrators.Regarding the issue of balanced punishment,money laundering should not constitute a crime even if the upstream crime does not constitute a crime.However,if the upstream behavior has reached the level of criminal law and has not yet been convicted,then the downstream behavior may constitute the crime of money laundering.In terms of the issue of sentencing for self money laundering,we should adhere to the principle of balancing upstream and downstream penalties and the punishment for money laundering should not exceed the severity of the punishment for upstream crimes.

关 键 词：洗钱罪 自洗钱 司法适用 罪数研究 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]