检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田英慧 时仲 TIAN Yinghui;SHI Zhong(Department of Linguistics/Institute for Chomsky Studies/Lab of Biolinguistics and Brain Sciences,Beijing Language and Culture University,Beijing,China 100083;Admissions Office,Beijing Chinese Language and Culture College,Beijing,China 102206)
机构地区:[1]北京语言大学语言学系/乔姆斯基研究所/生物语言学与脑科学实验室,北京100083 [2]北京华文学院招生办公室,北京102206
出 处:《昆明学院学报》2024年第5期11-20,共10页Journal of Kunming University
摘 要:在大语言模型备受关注且饱受争议的背景下,为回应部分人对于大语言模型的质疑,马霍瓦尔德(Mahowald)等人对“语言能力”的内涵进行了重新思考,并将其区分为“形式语言能力”和“功能语言能力”。文章基于马霍瓦尔德等人对于ChatGPT大语言模型两种语言能力的区分,进一步详细探讨了两种语言能力的内涵,并且对“大语言模型在何种程度上实现了或媲美了哪些语言能力”这一问题进行了深入探究。文章发现:(1)大语言模型对于两种语言能力的掌握上都仍有欠缺,尤其尚未掌握人类“句法”的核心部分;(2)大语言模型和人类的语言能力在“工作机制”上存在着本质的区别。这表明大语言模型虽然在语言处理方面取得了很大的进步,但与人类的语言能力相比,仍存在一定的差距。In response to the growing attention and controversy surrounding Large Language Models(LLMs),Mahowald et al.(2023)have reconsidered the concept of“linguistic competence”,proposing a distinction between“formal”and“functional”linguistic competence.The article is based on the distinction between the two language abilities in the ChatGPT Large Language Models by Mahowald et al.,and further explores the connotations of the two language abilities in detail.It also delves into the question that is“to what extent the Large Language Models have achieved or have been comparable to which language abilities”.The outcome reveals:(1)LLMs still exhibit shortcomings in both areas,particularly in their failure to fully grasp the core aspects of human syntax.(2)There are fundamental differences in the mechanisms of Large Language Models and human linguistic competence.This indicates that,despite significant advancements in language processing,Large Language Models remain limited,compared to human linguistic competence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7