从弘治十二年春闱案看科场押题  

Tang Yin’s Imperial Examination Fraud Case

作　　者：朱春宁 蔚然 Zhu Chunning;Wei Ran(China Jiliang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310081)

机构地区：[1]中国计量大学人文与外语学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《考试研究》2024年第6期88-93,共6页Examinations Research

摘　　要：科举制度是中国历史上一项重要的人才选拔制度,但是直至明朝,舞弊事件仍旧层出不穷,并不能做到选拔人才的绝对公平。弘治己未春闱案是一个比较独特的舞弊案,其以风闻立案,且并未有实证证明涉案人员唐寅舞弊,依据供词可见的是唐寅求其老师会试之前押题的可能性较大。押题这种行为,在现代也屡见不鲜,其并不可取,对于师生双方都是一种带有侥幸性质的投机行为。The imperial examination system is an important talent selection system in Chinese history.It reached its peak in the Ming Dynasty,but at the same time,a number of fraudulent examinations also emerged.In terms of the ways of fraud,it can be said that there are various,such as the cheat sheet written with mouse hair and the imperial examination sock,for fraud cases,the Ming court for this punishment is also very strong.The case of Hongwen's not yet in court is one of the typical examples.And Tang Yin,as one of the important figures,also went downhill because of his involvement in the case.This case not only prompted the Ming court to revise its own law,but also gave some enlightenment to the practice of inscription in later generations.

关 键 词：唐寅 科场舞弊 押题 

分 类 号：G424.74[文化科学—课程与教学论]