检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Ji-Xian Ma Zhuo-Yi Zhang Rong Di Jia-Jie Yang Si-Wen Tian Ya-Zhou Qin Wan-Hu Zhang Jian-Qin Lei Qiu-Ping Liu Jing-Ming Li
机构地区:[1]Department of Ophthalmology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710061,Shaanxi Province,China [2]Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang 330006,Jiangxi Province,China [3]Department of Ophthalmology,First Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua University,Hengyang 421005,Hunan Province,China
出 处:《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》2024年第11期2067-2073,共7页国际眼科杂志(英文版)
基 金:Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.82271098;No.81960177);Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province(2024SF-YBXM-322);Institutional Foundation of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University(No.2021ZXY-10).
摘 要:AIM:To compare the dif ferences of choroidal neovascularization(CNV)measurements between sweptsource and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography(SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA)in neovascular agerelated macular degeneration(nAMD)and the imaging reliability of the two devices.METHODS:Prospective comparative study.SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA were used to scan the same eye with the modes of 3×3 and 6×6 mm2 centered on the neovascularization.Only qualified images were chosen and the border of CNV was manually delineated by two graders independently.The area of CNV(ACNV),vascular perfusion density(PD),and vessel length density(VLD)within the delineation were calculated using Image J.The differences of CNV measurements between the two OCTA devices were compared using Bland-Altman analysis.The agreement between the two graders on the measurements of each device was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC).RESULTS:A total of 18 patients(22 eyes)with nAMD were included.The measurements of ACNV,PD,and VLD were 7.247±4.586 and 4.901±3.741 mm^(2),43.202±9.636 and 34.904±10.489,6.339±1.228 and 5.908±1.741 mm^(-1) for SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA,respectively.The differences between the two devices were 2.346±3.030 mm^(2)(Z=-3.782,P<0.0001),8.298±14.160(Z=-2.419,P=0.016),and 0.431±2.114 mm^(-1)(Z=-0.828,P=0.408)for ACNV,PD and VLD,respectively.The ICC between two graders were 0.893(P<0.001),0.902(P<0.001),0.885(P<0.001)for ACNV,PD,VLD in SS-OCTA,and 0.971(P<0.001),0.976(P<0.001),0.973(P<0.001)in SD-OCTA,respectively.CONCLUSION:Both OCTA devices have high imaging reliability.Compared with SD-OCTA,SS-OCTA has a larger ACNV measurements,but doesn’t show better resolution of internal vessels of CNV and well signal strength.
关 键 词:neovascular age-related macular degeneration swept-source SPECTRAL-DOMAIN optical coherence tomography angiography
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33