导师视角下的公共卫生研究生教育管理与教学现况评价  

Evaluation of the status of public health graduate education management and teaching from the supervisor's perspective

作　　者：刘梦荃 朱泉熔 贾金忠 王俊人[4] 严琪 李粤鑫 王志锋 Liu Mengquan;Zhu Quanrong;Jia Jinzhong;Wang Junren;Yan Qi;Li Yuexin;Wang Zhifeng(Department of Health Policy and Management,School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Branch Society Secretariat Office,Graduate School of Peking University Health Science Center,Beijing 100191,China;Research Center for Medical Degree and Graduate Education,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Student Office,School of Medical Humanities,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Jinan Third People's Hospital,Jinan 250101,China;Center for Health Policy and Technology Assessment,Peking University Health Science Center,Beijing 100191,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系,北京100191 [2]北京大学研究生院医学部分院学会秘书处办公室,北京100191 [3]北京大学医学学位与研究生教育研究中心,北京100191 [4]北京大学医学人文学院学生办公室,北京100191 [5]济南市第三人民医院,济南250101 [6]北京大学医学部卫生政策与技术评估中心,北京100191

出　　处：《中华医学教育探索杂志》2024年第9期1203-1209,共7页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research

基　　金：中国研究生院院长联席会2022年研究生教育课题立项资助项目(ACGS04-2022008)。

摘　　要：目的分析我国公共卫生研究生教育管理各环节评分及差异情况,为高校改进研究生教育管理提供参考建议。方法基于2021年全国医学研究生导师教育满意度与职业评价调查数据,从招生、课程、实践、科研及学校管理5方面描述我国公共卫生研究生教育管理情况,利用t检验、方差分析描述个人特征差异,使用多重线性回归分析来探究公共卫生研究生各环节教育管理评分的影响因素。结果导师对公共卫生研究生教育中的课程设置与教学环节(4.00±0.77)评分最高,其后依次为管理制度与管理投入(3.97±0.87)、科研条件与成果(3.93±0.80)、实践教学条件与效果(3.80±0.91),学科吸引力与招生质量(3.70±0.84)评分最低。指导专业学位、博士研究生、位于东部地区的导师对公共卫生研究生教育的总体评价较高,副高级职称的导师评价较低。结论公共卫生研究生教育生源质量有待提高,课程设置及教学方法需要调整,实践条件有待完善,科研经费不足,学术交流平台建设需完善,相关院校需加强管理、加大投入,促进公共卫生研究生教育高质量发展。Objective To analyze the scores and differences of various aspects of public health graduate education management in China,and to provide suggestions for universities to enhance graduate education management.Methods Based on the data from the 2021 National Survey on Education Satisfaction and Job Evaluation of Medical Graduate Supervisors,we described the public health graduate education management in China from the five perspectives of student enrollment,curriculum,practice,research,and school management.The t-test and analysis of variance were used to analyze the differences in individual characteristics.Multiple linear regression was used to analyze factors influencing the scores of public health graduate education management.Results Supervisors gave the highest score to curriculum and teaching(mean score,4.00±0.77),followed by management system and input(mean score,3.97±0.87),research conditions and achievements(mean score,3.93±0.80),practical education conditions and effects(mean score,3.80±0.91),and discipline attractiveness and enrollment quality(mean score,3.70±0.84).Supervisors who supervised professional degrees,doctoral students,and located in the eastern region gave relatively high scores to public health graduate education,and those with associate professor titles gave relatively low scores.Conclusions The quality of students recruited for public health graduate education needs to be improved,curriculum design and teaching method need to be adjusted,practice conditions need to be improved,research funding is insufficient,and the construction of academic communication platforms needs to be improved.The relevant universities/colleges need to strengthen the management and increase the investment to promote the high-quality development of public health graduate education.

关 键 词：公共卫生 研究生 教育管理 研究生导师 

分 类 号：R-05[医药卫生]