信息网络传播权侵权案件地域管辖问题的制度反思  

Institutional Reflection on Territorial Jurisdiction of Infringement Cases of TelecommunicationNetwork Rights

作　　者：杨明[1,2] Yang Ming

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院 [2]最高人民法院知识产权司法保护理论研究基地

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2024年第5期87-99,共13页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

摘　　要：最高人民法院第223号指导性案例的发布,对信网权侵权案件地域管辖规则的适用产生了重大影响,理论界和实务界均争议不断。在此背景下,重新审视《信网权解释》第15条与《民诉法解释》第25条之间关系的意义十分突出。基于地域管辖制度的建构基础的考量,以“或者”一词来连接“侵权行为地”和“被告住所地”并不合适,《信网权解释》第15条在修改时应将这两个连接点之间设置为有先后适用的顺位关系。在此基础上,进一步明确《民诉法解释》第25条不适用于信网权侵权案件,《信网权解释》第15条则应删除“发现侵权内容的计算机终端等设备所在地”之规定,同时改变将“侵权结果发生地”排除出管辖依据的观点。此外,由于信网权侵权案件往往与不正当竞争诉讼复合在一起,有必要从请求权基础及诉的合并理论着手,厘清复合案件的性质,进而藉此处理其地域管辖问题。The release of the Supreme People's Court's Guiding Case No.223 has had a significant impact on the application of the rules of territorial jurisdiction in cases of infringement of information network communication right,and has led to continuous disputes in both theoretical and practical circles.Against this background,the significance of re-examining the relationship between Article 15 of the Interpretation of the Right of Information Network and Article 25 of the Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law is very prominent.Based on the consideration of the construction basis of the territorial jurisdiction system,it is not appropriate to connect the“place of infringement”and the“defendant's domicile”with the word“or”,and Article 15 of the Interpretation of the Right to Information should be amended to connect the two.Article 15 of the Interpretation of the Right to Information should be amended to set up a precedence relationship between these two links with sequential application.On this basis,it is further clarified that Article 25 of the Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law is not applicable to cases of infringement of the right to information network,and Article 15 of the Interpretation of the Right to Information Network shall delete the provision of“the location of the computer terminals and other equipments where the infringing content is found”,and at the same time,change the provision of“the place where the infringing result occurs”.At the same time,it should change the view that“the place where the result of infringement occurs”should be excluded from the basis of jurisdiction.In addition,as the infringement cases of information network right are often compounded with unfair competition lawsuits,it is necessary to start from the basis of the right to claim and the theory of merger to clarify the nature of the compound cases,and then deal with the issue of territorial jurisdiction by doing so.

关 键 词：信息网络传播权 地域管辖 管辖连接点 侵权行为地 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学] D923.4[政治法律—法学]