检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱钊强 Qian Zhaoqiang
机构地区:[1]澳门大学法学院,中国澳门
出 处:《中国应用法学》2024年第5期155-170,共16页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
摘 要:确认权利或受法律保护利益之诉是澳门特别行政区《行政诉讼法典》赋予私人的重要司法保护手段之一,是行政诉讼有效司法保护原则的一种体现,本文从历史来源角度对该诉进行相对完整的梳理,并细致分析了现行制度在澳门特别行政区司法实务上所出现的问题以及观点。了解澳门特别行政区《行政诉讼法典》中的确认权利或受法律保护利益之诉对于理解大陆法系传统下的行政诉讼体系理论思考方向有良好的裨益,对该制度的研究也可以为我国行政诉讼立法的理论与实践思考提供一些有用的参照。The Macao Administrative Litigation Code is a very typical administrative litigation legal system in the European continental law tradition,which originated from Portugal.The action to confirm rights or interests protected by law is one of the important judicial protection channels granted to private individuals by the Macao Administrative Procedure Code and is a manifestation of the principle of effective judicial protection in administrative litigation.This article provides a relatively complete review of the lawsuit from the perspective of a historical angle and carefully analyzes the problems and viewpoints that arise in the current system in Macao's judicial practice.Understanding the action to confirm rights or legally protected interests in the Macao Administrative Procedure Code is of great benefit to understanding the theoretical thinking direction of the administrative litigation system under the European continental law tradition.The study of this system can also guide China's administrative litigation legislation.The theoretical and practical considerations provide some useful references.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.59.50