刑事程序中行为的量刑论考察  

Examination on the Sentencing Theory Regarding Acts in Criminal Proceedings

作　　者：潘文博 PAN Wenbo(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法律硕士学院

出　　处：《犯罪研究》2024年第4期63-69,共7页Chinese Criminology Review

基　　金：2021年度司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“类案检索深度应用下的罪刑均衡研究”(项目编号:21SFB3010)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：寻找认罪认罚从宽的实体法依据必须回溯到“刑事程序中行为”以及“犯罪后态度”的理论地位之上。对于“犯罪后态度”,无论是扩张责任概念的内涵还是采用“双轨的间接证据构造”,均不能予以合理化。“犯罪后态度”只能作为预防要素起作用。“刑事程序中行为”属于预防要素,在具体判断时不能升高刑罚量,而只具有保持刑罚量和降低刑罚量的功能。认罪认罚予以从宽应定位于行为人悔悟,即预防必要性降低,在我国传统理论语境中体现为社会危险性降低。对行为人的实体处遇不能直接从程序法中寻找依据,只能根据刑法的规定和量刑理论证成。It is necessary to look back upon the status of the concept"Acts in Criminal Proceedings"and"Post⁃criminal Behaviors"when seeking the substantial law basis of"System of Lenient Treatment for Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment".Whether by expanding the connotation of"liability"or by adopting"Dual⁃track Indirect Evidence Structure",the post⁃criminal attitudes cannot be rationalized.They can only take effect as an element of prevention.Acts in criminal proceedings,which are regarded as an element of prevention,can only maintain and mitigate the penalty instead of aggravating it when making judgements.System of lenient treatment for admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment should aim at repentance of the perpetrators,which leads to the reduction of the necessity of prevention,and the drop of social hazard in traditional Chinese theories.It′s not proper to seek the basis of the substantial law treatment of the perpetrators from procedural law,instead,it is necessary to find explanation in Criminal Law and the theory of sentencing.

关 键 词：犯罪后态度 刑事程序中行为 认罪认罚从宽 预防 量刑 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]