检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈慧兰 CHEN Huilan(Department of Pathology,Medical College,Fujian Health Vocational and Technical College,Fuzhou 350101,China)
机构地区:[1]福建卫生职业技术学院医学院病理教研室,福州350101
出 处:《中国医药指南》2024年第31期36-39,共4页Guide of China Medicine
基 金:福建卫生职业技术学院2022年度校级“课程思政”试点建设项目(SZ2022016);福建卫生职业技术学院2023年校级专业建设与教学改革项目(JG2023517)。
摘 要:目的探讨在高职院校病理学教学中应用基于问题导向教学法(PBL)结合临床病理讨论会(CPC)教学法的应用效果。方法2023年2月至2023年7月选取福建卫生职业技术学院医学院2022级临床医学专业的301~304班学生共136名,以教学班随机划分对照组和试验组。303、304班为对照组,共76人,301、302为试验组,共60人。对照组采取PBL教学法授课,试验组采用PBL结合CPC教学进行法教学,通过客观评价及主观评价比较两种教学法的应用效果。结果试验组平时测试成绩和期末成绩均高于对照组(均P<0.05)。在提高团队协作能力、提高查阅文献的能力、提高沟通表达能力等方面,两组对比差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。在激发学习兴趣、提高学习主动性、提高临床思维能力及综合分析能力以及对教学方法的满意度等方面,试验组对本组教学法的认同程度高于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论在高职病理学各论部分中采用PBL结合PBL教学法在激发学生兴趣和提高学习主动性和培养临床思维及综合分析能力以及提高学习成绩方面相较于单一PBL教学法更有优势。Objective To explore the application effect of problem-based learning(PBL)combined with clinical pathological conference(CPC)teaching method in pathology teaching in vocational colleges.Methods From February 2023 to July 2023,a total of 136 students were selected from 301 to 304 classes of clinical medicine majors of 2022 in the Medical College of Fujian Health Vocational and Technical College,and were randomly divided into control group and experimental group by teaching classes.303 and 304 classes were the control group with a total of 76 students,and 301 and 302 were the experimental group with a total of 60 students.The control group was taught by PBL teaching method,and the experimental group was taught by PBL combined with CPC teaching,and the effects of the application of the two teaching methods were compared through objective evaluation and subjective evaluation.Results The test group's usual test scores and final grades were higher than those of the control group(all P<0.05).In terms of improving teamwork ability,improving the ability to review literature,and improving communication and expression ability,the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant(all P>0.05).In terms of stimulating learning interest,improving learning initiative,improving clinical thinking ability and comprehensive analysis ability,as well as satisfaction with the teaching method,the experimental group's recognition of the teaching method in this group was higher than that of the control group(all P<0.05).Conclusions The use of PBL in the senior pathology section of the monographs combined with the PBL teaching method is more advantageous than the single PBL teaching method in stimulating students'interest and improving their learning initiative and cultivating clinical thinking and comprehensive analytical skills,as well as improving their learning performance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.254.28