《巴黎手稿》对国民经济学收入形式理论的批判  

Marx’s Critique of the Theory of Revenue Forms of National Economy in the“Manuscript of Paris”

作　　者：李彬彬 LI Binbin(School of Marxism,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学马克思主义学院,北京100871

出　　处：《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期1-6,共6页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：北京大学学科建设项目“唯物史观的创立过程及当代价值”研究(7100604138)。

摘　　要：《巴黎手稿》的“异化劳动理论”是针对国民经济学的收入形式理论提出的,具有批判国民经济学和资产阶级社会的重要功能。这一理论揭露国民经济学收入形式理论的自相矛盾,指出国民经济学虽然追求富国裕民,却带来工人的普遍贫困,其劳动价格理论把工人降低到动物的水平。异化劳动揭开收入形式所试图掩盖的阶级对抗关系,指出资本主义社会的阶级关系不是收入形式理论所设想的和谐共生关系,而是充满竞争和对抗。异化劳动理论还说明了私有财产的本质,指出人的异化就包含在国民经济学和私有财产的本质中,是对国民经济学的一种前提批判。“The theory of alienated labor”in the Manuscript of Paris was put forward against the theory of revenue forms of national economy.It is an important critique of national economy and bourgeois society.This theory discloses the antinomies of the theory of revenue forms of national economy,pointing out that although national economy endeavors to enrich the people,it results in universal poverty of the working class,and that its theory of labor price reduces the working class to animals.This theory exposes the conflicting class relation,which national economy tries to conceal,pointing out that,unlike what is stated in the theory of revenue forms,the class relation in bourgeois society is filled not with harmony but with conflicts.This theory also explains the essence of private property,pointing out that the alienation of human is embedded in national economy and the essence of private property,and this theory is a critique of the premise of national economy.

关 键 词：《巴黎手稿》 国民经济学批判 异化劳动理论 收入形式理论 私有财产的本质 

分 类 号：A121[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]