检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶美华 王品 周罗晶[2] Ye Meihua;Wang Pin;Zhou Luojing(School of Public Health,Dalian Medical University,Dalian 116044,Liaoning Province,China;Department of Science and Technology,Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital,Yangzhou 225001,Jiangsu Province,China)
机构地区:[1]大连医科大学公共卫生学院,大连116044 [2]江苏省苏北人民医院科技处,扬州225001
出 处:《中华医学科研管理杂志》2024年第5期379-383,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基 金:扬州市基础研究计划(联合专项)卫生健康类重点项目"负责任创新背景下多元共治的医学科技伦理治理模式研究"(2024-01-03)。
摘 要:目的围绕医学伦理审查互认重要性与协同治理的必要性,结合当前我国医学伦理审查互认现状,剖析推进审查互认存在的难点问题,探讨改进策略。方法采用文献研究法,对医学伦理审查互认相关文献研究成果进行梳理、归纳、提炼与总结。结果国内医学伦理审查互认尚存在医疗机构协同互认驱动力不足、制度与组织保障供给不充分、主审单位审查能力认可度不高及协同合作联动机制缺位等问题。结论从利益协同、制度与组织协同、能力协同和平台协同4个方面采取有效措施将有助于推进医学伦理审查互认。ObjectiveThis study focused on the importance of mutual recognition of medical ethics review and the necessity of collaborative governance,combining with the current situation of mutual recognition of medical ethics review in China,and analyzing the difficulties in promoting mutual recognition of review and exploring improvement strategies.MethodsA literature research method was used to sort,summarize,refine and conclude the findings of the literature related to mutual recognition of medical ethics review.ResultsChallenges persisted in the mutual recognition of medical ethics review in China,including inadequate impetus for mutual recognition among medical institutions,insufficient system and organizational support,limited acknowledgment of the audit unit's review capacity,and a lack of coordination and cooperation mechanisms.ConclusionsImplementing effective measures in benefit coordination,system and organization coordination,ability coordination,and platform coordination will facilitate the mutual recognition of medical ethics review.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38