检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:章俊麟 王少戎 王淑华 ZHANG Junlin;WANG Shaorong;WANG Shuhua(Center for Drug Evaluation,National Medical Products Administration,Beijing 100076,China)
机构地区:[1]国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心,北京100076
出 处:《药学研究》2024年第10期972-978,共7页Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
摘 要:各国监管机构为提高仿制药审评质量和效率发布了一系列常见缺陷和共性问题,为规范和提升化学仿制药注册申报质量发挥了重要的作用。本文对中美欧等监管机构已发布的与提高申报资料质量相关的指导原则或技术性文件进行归纳总结,对其中与仿制药注册申报中药学技术审评相关的共性问题进行介绍,希望能对促进我国仿制药的高质量发展提供一隅之见。Regulatory agencies in various countries have issued a series of documents on common deficiencies and issues to improve the efficiency of generic drug review,which play an important role in standardizing and improving the quality of filing information.This paper intends to summarize the guidelines or technical documents that have been issued by FDA,EMA and NMPA related to the improvement of the quality of the declaration information,and introduce the common issues related to the pharmacy technical review of the generic drug declarations therein,in the hope that it can provide a glimpse of the high-quality development and reform of China′s generic drugs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.233.20