检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李洁 LI Jie(School of Law,Central South University,Changsha,Hunan 410083,China)
出 处:《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期14-17,共4页Journal of Hebei North University:Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(17CFX038)。
摘 要:效力待定行政协议能够为解决行政纠纷提供缓冲,具有提高行政效率和维护相对人合法权益的双重功能。但由于立法与实践的错位,效力待定行政协议在实践中面临效力补正前置程序缺位、法律规范缺失和具体类型不明等困境。因此,应当确立行政协议效力补正前置程序,避免不必要的案件涌入法院;增加效力待定行政协议法律条款,明确法律依据;强化实质性化解行政争议功能,促进案结。The validity-pending administrative agreement can provide a buffer for the resolution of administrative disputes,and has the dual functions of improving administrative efficiency and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the counterpart.However,due to the misalignment between legislation and practice,the validity-pending administrative agreement is in the dilemma of the absence of the pre-procedure for the correction of validity,the lack of legal norms,and the obscurity of specific types.Therefore,it is necessary to establish a pre-procedure for supplementing and amending the validity of the administrative agreement and avoid unnecessary cases from flooding the courts,add legal provisions for the validity-pending administrative agreement and clarify the legal basis,and strengthen the function of substantively resolving administrative disputes and promote the conclusion of cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7