检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:左泽楠 Zuo Ze-nan(People's Public Security University of China,Beijing,100038 China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038
出 处:《西部公安论坛》2024年第3期38-43,49,共7页Journal of Western Public Security
摘 要:基层是产生矛盾纠纷的源头,也是解决矛盾纠纷的主体。矛盾纠纷的复杂化和多元化表明,单一部门或单一主体的传统分散型治理模式,无法有效化解矛盾纠纷,以多元化主体协同治理解决基层矛盾纠纷是新时代基层治理的目标。笔者基于SFIC模型分析框架,对B市P区说事评理议事普法中心的协同全过程进行研究,并在此基础上从夯实基础条件、强化催化领导、完善制度设计、优化协同过程、强化结果输出五个方面提出我国基层矛盾纠纷化解的现实路径。Grassroots is the source of conflicts and disputes,as well as the main body for resolving them.The complexity and diversification of contradictions and disputes indicate that the traditional decentralized governance model of a single department or subject cannot effectively resolve conflicts and disputes.The goal of grassroots governance in the new era is to use diversified subject collaborative governance to solve grassroots conflicts and disputes.Based on the SFIC model analysis framework,the author conducted a study on the collaborative process of the Public Opinion and I,egal Education Center in P district of B city.Based on this,the author proposed a practical path for resolving grassroots conflicts and disputes in China from five aspects:consolidating basic conditions,strengthening catalytic leadership,improving institutional design,optimizing collaborative processes,and enhancing result output.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.165.252