检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:廖奕[1] LIAO Yi
出 处:《政治与法律》2024年第11期20-35,共16页Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“弘扬社会主义法治精神研究”(项目编号:22AZD058)的研究成果。
摘 要:“建构中国自主法学知识体系”,是一个由政治命题衍生而成的学术命题。对于这一命题的题旨情境,可从意蕴定位、概念融贯和理论示范渐次展开,由此理解“为何建构”的问题。以古典中国的政法传统、近代中国的知识革命、当代中国的法学体系为线索,勾勒中国法学知识由传统向现代的演化,可以深入理解“何以建构”之历史逻辑。在方法要义上,阐释“建构中国自主的法学知识体系”命题,可从政治家、思想家、法学家、法律家、社会治理精英以及更大范围“公众”的统合视角展开,以融贯一体为基本方法,以政法知识为核心支点,以法理均衡为推进主线,从整体上更新对“如何建构”的认知。"Constructing the Independent Legal Knowledge System of China"is an academic proposition derived from a political proposition.Thematic context of such proposition may be developed progressively from the pinpointed meaning to integrated conception to theoretical demonstration,thus understanding the issue of"why construct".It is able to,by taking the political and legal tradition of classical China,the knowledge revolution of modern China and the legal-science system of contemporary China as clues and outlining the evolution of legal knowledge of China from traditional to modern,deeply understand the historical logic of"How to construct".In terms of methodological essence,it is advisable to,from the integrated perspectives of politicians,thinkers,jurists,lawyers,elites of social governance and the wider"Public",take integration as the basic method,political and legal knowledge as the core fulcrum,and the balanced jurisprudence as the main line,renew the cognition of"How to construct"on the whole.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49