检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡芷铟 HU Zhi-yin(Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出 处:《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》2024年第6期100-107,共8页Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering
摘 要:我国环境法治实践中存有大量责令改正的行政行为,其法律性质始终众说纷纭。经考察发现,环境责令改正存在立法模糊不清、适用混乱等现实问题。为充分发挥环境责令改正的制度价值,需以类型理论提炼环境责令改正的“中心价值”与基本要素,重塑法理基石,通过对环境责令改正的类型化,实现从模糊的“环境行政处理”向独立类型的行政行为的转向。具体可以通过规范环境责令改正的立法表达形式、表达结构和适用程序,改善环境责令改正的执法方式,实现环境责令改正的制度完善。There is a large amount of administrative actions of remediation obligations in the practice of environmental rule of law in China,and its legal nature has always been controversial.After investigation,it was found that there are practical problems such as legislative ambiguity and confusion in the application of environmental orders for correction.In order to fully realize the institutional value of environmental order to make corrections,it is necessary to extract the“central value”and basic elements of environmental order to make corrections through typological theory,reshape the legal foundation,and achieve a shift from vague“environmental administrative treatment”to independent types of administrative actions.This can be achieved by standardizing the legislative expression form,expression structure,and application procedures of environmental order to make corrections,improving the enforcement methods of environmental order to make corrections,and realizing the improvement of the institutional framework for environmental order to make corrections.
分 类 号:D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] F205[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3