认罪认罚案件中上诉权规制的理据、模式与路径再探  

The Reason,Mode and Path of the Regulation of Appeal Right in the Case of Guilty Plea

作　　者：吕子逸 Lv Ziyi(Institute of Law,China Law Society,Beijing 100080,China)

机构地区：[1]中国法学会法治研究所,北京100080

出　　处：《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期99-113,共15页Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“认罪认罚从宽制度的程序理论研究”(17AFX015)。

摘　　要：鉴于彰显认罪认罚从宽制度内在追求、维护认罪协商成果以及体现正当程序核心特征的需要,认罪认罚从宽制度改革中应当注意对上诉权的规制。认罪认罚案件中上诉权规制模式的建设,绝非向“无因上诉”模式或“有因上诉”模式的完全倾斜。基于厘清审判权法定边界、维系诉讼结构稳定性、减轻立法负担与防范条款含混情形的考虑,以“劝诫”为重心的上诉权规制模式将是颇具合理性的选择。借此,通过明确削弱负面效应、保护诉讼权益、维护认罪协商成果等目标,结合上诉审理形式、“上诉不加刑”原则、“全面审理”原则和发回重审制度的调适,上诉劝诫模式可为上诉机制与认罪认罚从宽制度的衔接探寻现实且可行的路径,实现实体正义、程序正义和协商性正义的融合。The construction of the regulation mode of the right of appeal in guilty plea cases is not a complete preference to the appeal or no appeal.Considering the need to highlight the internal pursuit of the system,maintain the results of the negotiation and reflect the core characteristics of due process,the regulation of the right of appeal should be included in the scope of the reform of the system for guilty plea.Based on the consideration of maintaining the legal boundary of judicial power and the stability of litigation structure,reducing the legislative burden and the ambiguous situation of prevention provisions,the regulation mode of appeal right focusing on"exhortation"will also be a reasonable choice.Therefore,by weakening the negative effect,protecting the rights and interests of litigation,maintaining results of pleaded guilty to negotiate,and considering appeal form,"appeal without punishment"principle,comprehensive review mechanism and retrial system adjustment,all this will explore a feasible path for the cohesion of appeal mechanism and pleaded guilty and plea bargaining,and realize the integration of entity justice,procedural justice and consultative justice.

关 键 词：认罪认罚二审案件 有因上诉 无因上诉 上诉劝诫模式 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]